Have you ever heard of a Gish gallop? It seems they've evolved to Youtube form.
Well I'm bored so here goes: Reverse order from 200 to 131 because well I don't have a reason for that actually. Sorry for the formatting/grammar errors. I banged it out kind of fast.
200,199,196 conclusions
198 assertion
197 assertion
195 false, overwhelming observation evidence
194 false analogy
193 assertion
191 assertion
190 non sequiter
189 this really isn't proof, the shape of the earth isn't particulary important until a civlization becomes sea-faring.
188 pendantics/assertion
187 false, the rotation of the earth is slowing down
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_rotation186,185,158,157 not how physics works,
http://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module1_Inertial.htmflight
I could spend a lot of time picking these apart but I don't need to. I just need one single flight that crosses the south pole
http://www.adventure-network.com/experiences/south-pole-flights184,183,182,181,180,179,
178 Strawman, nobody uses google earth as a logical proof.
177 completely out of context.
176,173,171 as flat earthers are so quick to point out, a photograph isn't the same thing as proof
175 jpeg compression artifacts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_artifact. Try downloading the uncompressed version.
174 Citation please?
172 video link? The iss has a constant live feed, it orbits pretty quick but you can see the clouds changing shape.
170 false. The iss can be discerned with binoculars.
169 false.
https://www.mydish.com/support/installation-manuals-page168 citation? My guess, they use cell towers as a fallback when weather conditions are poor. Therefore they would seem to perform worse in rural areas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_Internet_access. The flip side of this is if there are no cell towers how are they getting a connection.
167 The thermosphere is 85km above the Earth. Low earth orbtit is around 2000km.
166 non sequiter
165 buy a cheap telescope from wallmart and go to
http://www.isstracker.com/ if you want to check this out yourself.
164 Are the footage of space walks and walking on the lunar surface also shot in a vomit comet?
163 Citation
162 Rockets are normally launched to get something into orbit. Going straight up and then curving to achieve orbit is the most efficient use of fuel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_launch.
161 that's not how flight work
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight160 that's not how rockets work
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket159 that's not how gravity works
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity156 Were they 10km up?
http://www.howitworksdaily.com/how-high-do-you-have-to-go-to-see-the-curvature-of-the-earth/. Otherwise this is a non sequiter
155 If the curved glass made a difference you would see it at ground level too. Check your math on the horizon argument.
154 The red bull dive was a publicity stunt so they used a fish angle lens. I don't recall them stating that the intention was to prove the earth was round. Your math is still off on the horizon bit.
153,152 Non sequiter. I live in a valley, does that mean the Earth is really a bowl?
151 check your math. It technically is slightly irregular, the extreme distances just obscure that.
150 I'm quite sure you mean Sigma Octantis if you're seeing it from the southern hemisphere. Check your constellations around it if you're in doubt.
149 They don't remain fixed. They only seem like they do because of the extreme distances.
148 Ehh could somebody decode this? I can't quite make sense out of it.
147 I don't know who measured this but I think they need to recheck their results. Triangulating the distances using just a pole of a known height at 2 far enough places on the globe will indicate that one is much closer than the other.
146 Maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how this is proof of anything if it's true.
145 I don't know what photos you're looking at but it really looks like a sphere.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking read it and enjoy one of the marvels of the sky. Why would observers in the southern hemisphere see a slightly different side? Also why in a flat earth would the moon suddenly turn upside down when you're at the outer edge. FE kind of shoots itself in the foot with some of these points.
144 link? I can't seem to find this.
143 If we had no atmosphere then yes.
142 assertion. Math, citations?
141 the toilets flushing a different direction are a popular misconception. The coriolis effect just isn't that strong. It is a thing though. You can see for yourself
http://www.carolina.com/teacher-resources/Interactive/modeling-the-coriolis-effect/tr10643.tr140 That's not how a Foucault pendulum works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum139 Rowbotham botched this experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment He failed to take into account atmospheric refraction. This is actually pretty easy to test at home. Get a friend, a pair of bionoculars, go to the nearest lake larger than a few miles, get your friend to stand on the shore on the other side and see if you can see his feet or not.
138 The perspective argument is a bit of a red herring here. Get a telescope with variable zoom. Go to a port. Zoom in and out on ships leaving the shore.
137,136 God damnit! You're going to make me read up on eclipses? I'll have to get back to you on this one.
135 Yeah I'm going to need a link to that data. It sounds like another botched experiment.
134 That's not how reflection work
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_(physics)
133 Moonlight is a whole hell of a lot weaker than sunlight. The moon actually cooling things? That's an experiment that no one can seem to reproduce.
http://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=1590436706491009951132,131 I can't even...