21
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: March 19, 2024, 12:47:16 PM »
^Claims the Simpsons are an authoritative source on how real lives and procedural actions regarding policy should be conducted.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
No, he was talking about potential therapy for respiratory infections.Well, good to know he's really really bad at siting sources. And context since he was just talking about disinfecting rooms with light. But hey, good on you for proving a point.Source?https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/05/02/fact-check-covid-19-uv-light-treatment-research-underway-los-angeles/3053177001/
"On April 20, three days before Trump made his remarks, pharmaceutical company Aytu Bioscience announced that it had signed an exclusive license for worldwide rights to the Healight Platform Technology under research at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles."
Not only was it staged, it was horrendously staged. Given the feeble first step of offering a quote regarding something that was actually legitimate.QuoteThe different answers based on the same words. But as Honk said, was likely staged or carefully picked.What hypocrisy?QuoteI suppose when anyone mentions Joe Biden has dementia, it is because the rackety old paedo has dementia.
So you admit that its not what's said but who says it. Love the honesty on your hypocracy.
There is nothing that old paedo fuck could ever say that would be remotely truthful or worthwhile.
Source?https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/05/02/fact-check-covid-19-uv-light-treatment-research-underway-los-angeles/3053177001/
What hypocrisy?QuoteI suppose when anyone mentions Joe Biden has dementia, it is because the rackety old paedo has dementia.
So you admit that its not what's said but who says it. Love the honesty on your hypocracy.
Again, you are calling into question whether these people should be allowed to vote, when you yourself, on these very boards, were making fun of Trump for making the truthful statement about UV therapeutic treatment, when he made it.If you are claiming the average joe on the street doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground, you got no argument from me.Well alrighty then. In that case I guess we're not too far apart on this one.
But it is troubling. These people can vote. And there they are doing a 180 degree turn on the spot depending on whether a certain event or comment they're presented with is said to have come from Biden (in which case it's "Boo! Hiss! Biden bad") or Trump (in which case it's "Well, he has a point. U-S-A! U-S-A!")
Again, you're getting bogged down in the detail of whether you can shine UV light in to someone and cure Covid. It doesn't matter. It was just one example in the video. There are others. The point is the people's opinions about what was said or done wasn't based on the merits of them but based entirely on who they were told had said or done those things. I'm not saying Trump has a monopoly on stupid voters by the way, but sheesh! No wonder we end up with such poor leaders.
Trump never said anything about drinking bleach. And you are supposedly making a critical post about the abilities of other people to cast a reasoned vote, based on their inability to correctly attribute quotes? Are you fucking serious?Just, please don't drink bleach to own the libs.Don't you tell me what to do
He really has to stop saying this shit. I know some people think that the press unfairly obsess over him, maybe with some justification, but holy shit he gives a lot of ammo.
If you are claiming the average joe on the street doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground, you got no argument from me. I see it exhibited in a multitude of posts from the re-adherents here everyday.The very first question by "the "man in the street," to the layperson had to do with the issue of a "shining light cure," for respiratory illness, such as corona.Are you currently in training for the "missing the point" event in the 2024 Paris Olympics?
Since UV light is a safe and effective treatment, as anyone can see, can we just dispose of your nonsense now?
If so then I think the US is a shoo-in for a gold medal.
The point is not whether what Trump said was stupid, or whether what Trump did was bad.
The point is that the same person when presented with a certain statement declared it the ramblings of a dementia patient when told it was Biden who said it. When the person pretended that "whoopsie-doodle, I got my notes mixed up" and told them it was actually Trump who said it then suddenly it was all "well, it would depend what that technology was..." and so on.
Do you see the problem?
What do you mean it was done after Trump said it?Sigh.The very first question by "the "man in the street," to the layperson had to do with the issue of a "shining light cure," for respiratory illness, such as corona.video snipped because Jimmy Kimmel is a goddamn moron
This is why democracy is a terrible idea.
Since UV light is a safe and effective treatment, as anyone can see, can we just dispose of your nonsense now?
https://www.google.com/search?q=UV+light+treatment+for+respiratory+illness&rlz=1C1GCEO_en&oq=UV+light+treatment+for+respiratory+illness&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigAdIBCTEyOTQzajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Nice find.
I mean, it was done after Trump said it but thats not the point. If it was, why did they say Joe Biden had dimentia? Surely the answers should have been the same regardless of who said it, no?
Sigh.The very first question by "the "man in the street," to the layperson had to do with the issue of a "shining light cure," for respiratory illness, such as corona.video snipped because Jimmy Kimmel is a goddamn moron
This is why democracy is a terrible idea.
Adding "his party all saying," doesn't help your post.Despite his party all saying they would vote no to remove before seeing any evidence?You are correct, I am.It means there was not enough evidence to convict Trump of inciting an insurrection.
Well, thats a bad ruling. Means insurrection is ok so long as your party controls congress.
Joe better get impeached, then, so he can be immune to legal issues later.
It means the words incitement and insurrection don't mean what you think they mean.
Surely you're trolling.
You are correct, I am.It means there was not enough evidence to convict Trump of inciting an insurrection.
Well, thats a bad ruling. Means insurrection is ok so long as your party controls congress.
Joe better get impeached, then, so he can be immune to legal issues later.
Trump was acquitted in the 2nd Impeachment.Yeah, I did read it. It is up to Congress to determine that. And they already did in the 2nd Impeachment.The ruling from the Supreme effectively buries any talk of Trump participating in an insurrection. Which was just more bullshit spewed by the communists anyway.No it doesn't. Did you not read the ruling?
The ruling stated that states can't decide how to implement section 3 on their own. Only the federal government can. Nothing about if Trump is or isn't guilty.
Incorrect.
Congress does not determine guilt or innocence. Otherwise Bill Clinton did nothing wrong.
Yeah, I did read it. It is up to Congress to determine that. And they already did in the 2nd Impeachment.The ruling from the Supreme effectively buries any talk of Trump participating in an insurrection. Which was just more bullshit spewed by the communists anyway.No it doesn't. Did you not read the ruling?
The ruling stated that states can't decide how to implement section 3 on their own. Only the federal government can. Nothing about if Trump is or isn't guilty.
There were no long distance non-stop commercial flights in the celestial navigation days. This is exactly the kind response I'd expect from someone that has absolutely no self awareness.The first non-stop flights made were all non-commercial.
I already made my statement.They have not been making non-stop flights to Johannesburg from London for that long.Where is your evidence for this?
Also, need I remind that your question was:QuoteHow long have they been able to fly non-stop from London to Johannesburg?
The 707 was able in 1950. If you wanted a different answer, you should have asked a different question.
Introducing a prior multistop route into the discussion of a long-distance non-stop route is typical of the BS you try to interject into any examination of issues conducted in the threads on these boards. Your style is tiresome and weary and isn't worth the effort.When you compare those routes when they started to what they fly now, they are essentially the same, as I stated.In what way is the route from London to Johannesburg the same today as it was in 1930?
Confirming my response then. The long-distance routes today used by airliners have changed very little.In your original response, you chose to provide the route taken by Lindbergh, which...SURPRISE!!!...doesn't vary much from what is taken now. Projection?No, not projection at all. Is that another word you have trouble with?
Go back and read that post. I specifically said it was like the route they take today. I was using it as an example of one of the first great circle routes. Here's a reminder:Quote from: BillOSome routes starting in the late 1930s when planes had more range, like Lindberg's flight from NY to Paris, did roughly use great circles. Those are still in use today (a bit more accurate though), but their geometry would make little sense on a flat earth.
Not hardly, as the sphere that should be labeled as such by them is NOT the earth, but the celestial sphere above.Yeah, one of the holes is using the dimensions of a spherical earth to arrive at a conclusion.Yes, thanks for pointing that out, and not only is not a "hole" it proves their point as when they use a flat earth is does NOT work.
Your getting like Ranty now, working hard to prove the earth is round!! Keep it up buddy!
What slight chance?How long have they been able to fly non-stop from London to Johannesburg?Ever since planes with the range have been available, and that matters squat because they do fly non-stop from London to Johannesburg and back and they don't fly the old routes anymore. On the slight chance you are asking in earnest, the Boeing 707 was the first airliner that was capable of making the flight. It was first flown in 1950. So, the ability has been there for 74 years.
In your original response, you chose to provide the route taken by Lindbergh, which...SURPRISE!!!...doesn't vary much from what is taken now. Projection?You have nothing.You have to love the projection here. Scintillating!
Yeah, one of the holes is using the dimensions of a spherical earth to arrive at a conclusion.Even that paper is full of holes.So surely you can point out a few of these "holes" with your detailed reasoning as to why they are "holes", to help us all understand, right? Or are you just making baseless statements?