1
Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Cavendish experiment
« on: April 26, 2021, 07:01:03 PM »Quote
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle applies to quantum mechanics not orbital mechanics.
That's not correct. It's a general rule that applies to any Fourrier transform. In signal processing, it's better known as Nyquist theorem.
Quote
I don't understand the question. What do you mean by "change speed with 1/ms in one direction"? And what does the question have to do with the shape of the earth?
It has to do with a earth being stationary. If you travel 9 m/s, your kinetic energy is 8.100 joule (at 200 kg), at 10 m/s, it's 10.000 joule, and at 11 m/s, it's 12.100 Joules. Now if you move at 10 m/s, and your environment (earth) does so too, what they claim with the spheircal earth, you would perceive as standing still. But it would cost more energy to change speed in one direction, than that it would in the other direction.
Quote
Incorrect. The answer does vary depending on which version of the cavendish experiment is performed. It has moved beyond the torsion balance method and now setups using atomic fountains that measure quantum interference has been used. The accuracy of the measurements are extremely high and variances of more than .001% are considered large. There are plans to use do the atomic fountain set up with strontium atoms instead of rubidium which will eliminate the effects of magnetic interference and increase the accuract by orders of magnitude.
I can argue with you about this but it's going to be a 'yes it is', 'no it isn't' discussion. I'm talking about the original experiment. Show me one youtube video that calculates the correct result.
About the atomic fountains method, I don't know, I have no experience. Is it someting eeny meeny tiny so that you cannot see it and have to use a computer? Then I know enough. I worked in semicon tools development for a decade now.