*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7849
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #40 on: August 04, 2015, 02:43:29 AM »
So why would it work on all other browsers but not Edge?

Think MS disallowed null JScript object creation?
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline juner

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10235
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #41 on: August 04, 2015, 04:32:50 AM »
Another interesting note is that it also works when the user agent string is set to Edge Win 10 Mobile. If I remember correctly, the implementations were supposed to be the same.

*

Offline xasop

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9851
  • Professional computer somebody
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #42 on: August 04, 2015, 05:58:55 AM »
So why would it work on all other browsers but not Edge?

Think MS disallowed null JScript object creation?

SexWarrior showed me something which seems to indicate that inline Javascript is being blocked by CORS policy. Naturally, this sounds too pants-on-head retarded even for Microsoft, but it would explain the symptoms observed. It would need to be done conditionally on the user agent setting, which is even more bizarre.

I doubt this will be a quick fix, so I probably won't get time to confirm or deny this hypothesis until at least the weekend.
when you try to mock anyone while also running the flat earth society. Lol

geckothegeek

Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #43 on: August 04, 2015, 08:54:12 PM »
To the administrators:

There may be some compatibility issues on this website but the response time is certainly better than the other FES website. From viewers like us. Thank You !

*

Offline Misero

  • *
  • Posts: 94
  • Evidence, Evidence, Evidence, and more Evidence.
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #44 on: August 21, 2015, 07:01:37 PM »
I figure this will all be solved when plugins are introduced. I imagine "Old JavaScript Compatability" will be near the top of whatever store there is for plugins.
Nobody should ever follow my standard.  I am the worst moderator ever.
Yes, I'll still keep that in mind on this forum too.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16271
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #45 on: August 22, 2015, 05:18:44 AM »
I would hope that this wouldn't *need* a plugin. Basic JS support should be a given in a browser that explicitly advertises how much it loves JS.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16271
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #46 on: August 24, 2015, 11:12:36 AM »
I'm monitoring the SMF 2.1 Beta repository and the SMF Support Forums for potential fixes. They're aware of the situation and they might have a solution (as per this post).

Unfortunately, they don't seem to specify what their proposed solution is, so we can't adopt it early. I suppose the good news is that it will be fixed eventually.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16271
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #47 on: August 24, 2015, 05:13:58 PM »
After a bit of drama on the SMF forum, this should now be fixed. Please let me know if anyone observes any uncommon behaviour from the editor window after this change.

Note that in most cases the relevant script will have been cached by the browser. You may need to clear the cache to see it take effect.

Let's keep the thread open for now in case there's any feedback, but this should be safe to close in a few weeks.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume

Thork

Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #48 on: August 24, 2015, 05:16:53 PM »
It works! Good job guys.


Now if you can fix animated avatars and resizing of avatars ...  ;)

*

Offline jroa

  • *
  • Posts: 3094
  • Kentucky Gentleman
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #49 on: August 24, 2015, 05:27:26 PM »
Your animated avatar is working.

Thork

Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #50 on: August 24, 2015, 06:09:37 PM »
Your animated avatar is working.
And that required much messing around and a loss of resolution when I shrunk it.

*

Offline jroa

  • *
  • Posts: 3094
  • Kentucky Gentleman
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #51 on: August 25, 2015, 04:00:56 PM »
Your animated avatar is working.
And that required much messing around and a loss of resolution when I shrunk it.

Mine worked fine the very first time I tried it.  Are you sure you are not complaining about Windows making it hard to make an animated avatar or something like that?  I am failing to see what you are complaining about this time. 

Thork

Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #52 on: August 25, 2015, 04:16:09 PM »
The forum has bugs when uploading. The admins know ... it is just a pain to fix.

This thread can be closed. The original issue is solved.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16271
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Site not compatible with Edge
« Reply #53 on: August 26, 2015, 06:18:03 AM »
[...] Please let me know if anyone observes any uncommon behaviour from the editor window after this change.

[...]

Let's keep the thread open for now in case there's any feedback, but this should be safe to close in a few weeks.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume