Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Because it's free
This is the first time Microsoft have offered their OS free.
Yep, having to do two pictures every 43 years will do that to you. Bound to get tired of doing the same thing over and over.
Do you know that there are several geostationary weather satellites taking real time pictures of the whole globe every 3 hours, and you can download the images?
Maybe you don't?
Here's a link to the Japanese meterological services Himawari8 satellite. Launched last year on a Japanese Space Agency H-11A rocket, from the Yoshinobu Launch Complex, no NASA here.
http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/satellite/news/himawari89/20141218_himawari8_first_images.html
I can't wait till the Japanese Manga artists get to work on the production versions.
ok. You are now bummed at .org. I hope you are happy now.On the old site, former moderators are given the title of "The leader ones" to distinguish them from the other members. I would like to submit a sugestion to do something similar here. Perhaps "Flat Earth Advisor" or something similar for PP(sexaholic), Gayer, and Roundy? Thoughts?
I think instead of pursuing this you should pop over to .org and ban.... Everyone.
And anyway, my warranty ran out 6 months ago.
And so all that is left to do ... is punish Yaakov.
We are not discussing how it could be implemented, but how it actually is now.If you look up transponder footprints you will find that link above covers the whole of the USA.That's a good idea. To make it more accurate use 4 locations more than 500 miles apart from each other.QuoteWhy are 'they' not going to publish information that people in the industry need?When did I ever say that? They do give off readings that will serve the same purpose. Put it like this: one satellite and two houses. The satellite gives a signal in a straight line to those two houses; that's your model. Now, take those lines, and place, say, a balloon where that line passes through a certain altitude: there you go, done.
You may just find the angles fit a round earth with a geostationary satellite, as shown by various calculators, and used by everyone in the industry.
How high would a balloon have to be to cover all of the USA? http://www.satbeams.com/footprints?position=287
I don't know, you tell me. Better yet, tell me why there has to only be one balloon.
Still waiting for why that could only ever possibly be achieved by one transmitter.
with any luck, common sense has prevailed and Ireland has voted to end marriage discrimination.
That won't be the case either way, as this referendum is only dealing with some aspects of marriage discrimination, not all of it.
there is no gravity...our weight keeps us stuck to the earth.
Hm I wonder what causes weight...
Denpressure.there is no gravity...our weight keeps us stuck to the earth.
Hm I wonder what causes weight...
Please contribute when you post. That way, I will not have to split your posts or move them. Thanks. Consider this a warning.But the image was flat until you proved that it was round.
The people who proved the earth was round are proven liars. There are many inexplicable things in the photos and footage from space. Therefore, those sources cannot be trusted and the earth is flat until proven otherwise.
Citation needed.
Similarly, the theory of gravity tells us the fact that there is gravity (it has been demonstrated for centuries - we even have laws of gravity which are mathematical relationships of how celestial bodies interact with each other which accurately explain the relationships between planets and their moons, the planets revolving around the sun, etc) and gives us the best explanation of how it works based on our current information. There is a lot we do not understand about how gravity works right now, which is why some scientists are trying to come up with new ideas on how gravity interacts, but the likelihood that any new discovery will change the scientific fact of gravity is next to nothing.
First of all, you make assumptions about the age of the Earth. No big deal, but they are still assumptions. Next, you assume the speed of light. Again, not a big deal. However, next you assume that Newtonian physics can work for something more than you driving to the store. Newtonian physics has been known for more than a century to be incorrect, yet, you preach it like a cult member. Special Relativity will show you that you can accelerate indefinitely and never reach the speed of light. Therefore, incorrect.
The age of the Earth and the speed of light have been verified by many scientists and researchers all over. Special relativity is a little more complicated area of physics, where things get complicated very fast. I find it funny you accept S.R. but not the age of the Earth or c
Anyways, can you be a little more specific on the part of S.R. that specifies what you are claiming?
No theory is completly verifiable. But you can make experiments to be sure on a 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% level or something! That is called 'science'.
