Recent Posts
So.... does that mean that some of the non-trump republicans would vote for Biden instead?
Why is the Moon's shadow at the time of the Total Solar Eclipse placed elsewhere other than the plane of the ecliptic upon the earth? The time of the Total Eclipse should be where the Moon intersects the Sun on the Ecliptic.
The "Path of Totality", where the Moon completely completely covers the Sun in Total Solar Eclipse, and the point where the Moon crosses the Ecliptic in the sky to the observer, is often visible to observers from a very odd shape upon the Earth. All of the observers on this darkened path see the Moon completely covering the sun in complete totality:
https://www.exploratorium.edu/eclipse/2024-total-solar-eclipse-guide
I don't know why Tom keeps saying this. It's like he thinks it's the general opinion of liberals, like we've been saying this over and over for as long as he has, perpetually locked in the fantasy that Trump's comeuppance is right around the corner, and obviously that's not the case with most of us. I doubt there are many American liberals that by this point don't have the attitude that nothing is going to hurt Trump because he's invincible, or at least that they'll believe it when they see it.
The V-Safe is where the data screened from VAERS (by the CDC) is presented. That had nothing to do with the VAERS reports.
At this point, the CDC has looked at 780,000 reports of injury from the coof vaxx and has confirmed they are legitimate.
The article linked by Dr. Mittal states a lawsuit needed to be filed just to get access to this data from the CDC.
Sounds like a coverup, uh?
https://meganredshaw.substack.com/p/cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=395439&post_id=143267075&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2s9pt&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
It should be evident at this point why the CDC fought so hard to keep this information from being released. They likely knew that if it were made public, they would have better success marketing their shots to a group of penguins.
But don’t take my word for it—comb through the data yourself.
Incorrect.I think you fail to realize these are reports that have been screened by the CDC and have been found to be legitimate.https://www.linkedin.com/posts/draryan_cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine-injury-activity-7181846614393655296-leK2
"Despite what the CDC says, it’s unclear whether the agency was asleep at the wheel or intentionally steering the Titanic into an iceberg."
780,000...that is a fairly large number.
780,000 people who posted whatever they wanted at anytime. Yep, totally legitimate and helpful and in no way able to be abused.
"Talaat says the best source of research stemming from VAERS is the CDC, because they are able to trace the records backward and verify them."
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt
Which hasn't been done.
https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
Read em for yourself. The raw data (which you are referencing) has alot of "no." "None" "just got the shot" "soreness" , etc...
So its much, much less than what you wrote.
The CDC has screened the VAERS.
ICAN has absolutely nothing to do with the report issued by the CDC.
You are being highly disingenuous with your posts, when there is absolutely no reason to do so except to spread deliberately false information.
Incorrect.I think you fail to realize these are reports that have been screened by the CDC and have been found to be legitimate.https://www.linkedin.com/posts/draryan_cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine-injury-activity-7181846614393655296-leK2
"Despite what the CDC says, it’s unclear whether the agency was asleep at the wheel or intentionally steering the Titanic into an iceberg."
780,000...that is a fairly large number.
780,000 people who posted whatever they wanted at anytime. Yep, totally legitimate and helpful and in no way able to be abused.
"Talaat says the best source of research stemming from VAERS is the CDC, because they are able to trace the records backward and verify them."
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt
Which hasn't been done.
https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
Read em for yourself. The raw data (which you are referencing) has alot of "no." "None" "just got the shot" "soreness" , etc...
So its much, much less than what you wrote.
I think you fail to realize these are reports that have been screened by the CDC and have been found to be legitimate.https://www.linkedin.com/posts/draryan_cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine-injury-activity-7181846614393655296-leK2
"Despite what the CDC says, it’s unclear whether the agency was asleep at the wheel or intentionally steering the Titanic into an iceberg."
780,000...that is a fairly large number.
780,000 people who posted whatever they wanted at anytime. Yep, totally legitimate and helpful and in no way able to be abused.
"Talaat says the best source of research stemming from VAERS is the CDC, because they are able to trace the records backward and verify them."
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt
