Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Best explanation of tides I have found in a while.
All wrong. The Tidal Forces act upon the Continental Land Masses.. not the oceans. This also explains why lakes (even huge lakes) don't experience the same effect. Additionally, this has much to do with earthquakes, magma creation and the predictable eruption of geysers.
Yes, apologies. FoR means frame of reference. For an observer on Earth, light would take a straight line path from the emitter to the moon. For an observer in a different perspective the light may indeed appear to curve. In this case, the acceleration would be coordinate acceleration though, and not proper acceleration and does not require anything other than a non-inertial FoR.
Yes, apologies. FoR means frame of reference. For an observer on Earth, light would take a straight line path from the emitter to the moon. For an observer in a different perspective the light may indeed appear to curve. In this case, the acceleration would be coordinate acceleration though, and not proper acceleration and does not require anything other than a non-inertial FoR.
When the interference is detected in a Sagnac experiment you have a rotating frame which is... Non-inertial! Looks like SR is not even relevant. Fortunately GR can explain the result.
When the interference is NOT detected in the Sagnac experiment (when stationary) you have the rotating EARTH!!! which is even non-inertial system then ALSO in this case the SR is not even relevant. Un-Fortunately for you the GR theory is only crap.. xDTell me, how the MM experiment should be interpreted. When you consider the observations of astronauts and satellites of the Earth's motion I think you must reconsider your silly conclusions.
In the M-Gale experiment has been simulated the earth's angular-speed and in THAT case the interferences were DETECTED!!! (as born coordinates confirms) then if the EARTH is rotating the M-m experiments MUST have wrong results... try to research in the right way please....
Rotational Velocity IS a relevant factor but, with Diffraction and barring other encumbrances, returning photons at the detectors should still be possible. The MAJOR factors which I believe to be insurmountable to the LLR experiments would be the Orbital Velocity of Earth around the Sun (30km/s), the Velocity of the Solar System through the Milky Way (220km/s) and the Velocity of the Milky Way through the Universe (600km/s). If ANY of these velocities are even CLOSE to correct... the laser pulse will never even hit the Moon at all unless the Moon is positioned either in front or behind the Earth relative to the direction of travel when the pulse is fired. Even then, we would get dramatically different distancing results based on which of those 2 positions the Moon were occupying at the time.
Unfortunately you are not analyzing the FoR properly. The light emitted from the Earth will carry all the vectors that contribute to the Earth's motion.
When the interference is detected in a Sagnac experiment you have a rotating frame which is... Non-inertial! Looks like SR is not even relevant. Fortunately GR can explain the result.
When the interference is NOT detected in the Sagnac experiment (when stationary) you have the rotating EARTH!!! which is even non-inertial system then ALSO in this case the SR is not even relevant. Un-Fortunately for you the GR theory is only crap.. xDTell me, how the MM experiment should be interpreted. When you consider the observations of astronauts and satellites of the Earth's motion I think you must reconsider your silly conclusions.
In the M-Gale experiment has been simulated the earth's angular-speed and in THAT case the interferences were DETECTED!!! (as born coordinates confirms) then if the EARTH is rotating the M-m experiments MUST have wrong results... try to research in the right way please....