Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Did you have some hope that you could provide definitive evidence of a conspiracy after Dr. Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy destroyed all previous attempts.
If so, document it, research whether Phil Plait or Myth Busters already busted it, and then submit it to both.
I can't find where this subject has been busted by children's book author Phil Plait. Kindly find a source for your nonsense.
I don't see where the subject has been busted. Are you saying that this children's author may have busted it?No, I am not saying, and have not said, that "this children's author" may have busted it. Are you saying that a text written at a child's level cannot show that you're wrong about some fact? Are you saying that if I refer to such an author that everything he (or she) has written is not a real strong argument? Do I need to remind you of the "ad hominem" fallacy yet again?
Real strong argument there.
I've already shown via diagram that it's impossible for the moon to be in the sky with the sun, since the angles would need to be in excess of 0.5 degrees. A video showing the sun and moon in the sky simultaneously is dirt in your face.Would you care to provide such a video? I don't recall seeing the sun in the OP video.
You now content that the South Pole has been discovered after years of claiming fraud covers up the circumferential nature of the SP. You presented evidence of that fraud.Except that we often provide evidence to back the allegations of fraud.Just as you did with the South Pole fraud that you now champion as wrong?
How is your record of providing innuendo even come close to evidence of any fraud?
I don't know what you're talking about in regards to the South Pole.
There is plenty of evidence of fraud. Consider the missing Lunar Rover tracks, for instance.
The enlightened see it for what it is: evidence of a hoax. The brainwashed call it "the astronauts carried the Lunar Rover around with them on the moon rather than driving it".
You're also on record that the movie Apollo 18 was a documentary with its moonbuggy. Now you want to argue that the Lunar Landings are a hoax? Really?
Did you have some hope that you could provide definitive evidence of a conspiracy after Dr. Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy destroyed all previous attempts.
If so, document it, research whether Phil Plait or Myth Busters already busted it, and then submit it to both.
There is plenty of evidence of fraud. Consider the missing Lunar Rover tracks, for instance.
That is not evidence.
You stated that images can't be presented as a proof in this forum.
Please, show only trustable evidence.
The Queen of England is hardly a running joke. She is one of the wealthiest people on the planet and hides her wealth behind the Bank of England nominees. She has the power to dissolve parliament, is head of our armed forces and has the power of veto over any law parliament wishes to pass. Lets not make Daniel quite that important.
I just don't see why he should be figurehead any more? He doesn't do anything to warrant it. We don't need him.
I just don't think we need him. He doesn't offer much.
I just don't see the point. Daniel isn't going to change. He'll continue to be ever-absent. If he is in any way an obstacle after a re-unification, it is pointless to go back. Hey, we aren't doing so bad. We are killing them at social media and with a few additional changes such as membership and T-shirts, we'll get some good momentum going. Its Daniel that has the problem right now. Not us. Lets see what if anything he is willing to concede before we give away the independence we worked so hard to achieve.
Doesn't Daniel run the society? If he supersedes the Zetetic council's rulings and you guys don't control the forum, what are you doing exactly? All the while, you are attempting to patch things up with Daniel and reintegrate the two divisions, but the Zetetic Council is trying to do Daniel's job. Is this not a conflict?
I'm all for combining the two groups and living in harmony, but I think some people need to get some perspective on who is doing what and how much of a backseat you guys will be taking if Daniel does rule once again.
And it's all we're ever going to get, at best. I don't know why you guys are talking about officially making Daniel a "figurehead," let alone his resignation. Why don't you ask for a nice foot rub from him while you're at it? Getting him to agree to turn over technical control will be tough enough.
Sounds good to me. I hesitate to call RET a 'hoax', though. Not all theories give equal weight to the Conspiracy. I'll make a separate thread where we can type up something more official.
If I had started a club or society, appointing myself as president, and my group members suddenly started calling for elections to change things up in order to grow and prosper I would be embarrassed to say "I'm the president. No elections!" Wouldn't you?That would depend whether it was a large number of members or just a vocal few disgruntled members.