Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Wait wait wait...What, you think this is unusual?
You consider something a pandemic if you can see the virus isolated? Like in a petridish?
The night sky seen from the northern and southern hemispheres is radially different. No matter how powerful your telescope you can not see stars that are on the other side of the planet from your position. That is what we observe and it makes perfect sense for a ball earth. But why would it be true for a flat earth?Despite the height of an object above our heads, it will eventually be obscured by objects arising from the flat earth plane.
Yeah, they have had the sequencing map since 2005.QuoteThe entire virus in isolation.
They have the entire genome of the virus.
Why do you think the virus hasn’t been isolated?Perhaps because it hasn't in a single actual case.
Yes, you should learn to understand that when MSM opens its yap, it is untrustworthy.No Canadian province has provided evidence for a pandemic.Still waiting for this source that says they drooped it because Canada didn't provide any scientific evidence covid is dangerous.When you have no proof of a scientific nature in order to justify prior measures and are asked to provide it, but do not, then the reason why you are dropping it is evident.Tuberculosis and lung cancers are also respiratory illnesses that aren’t flus.Alberta is taking the same approach as it would to any other respiratory illness.
That is a fact.
Context matters. They are taking this approach because of the vaccine.
Neither has any other country, for that matter.
So... Lets ignore the mountains of evidence.
Tell me... What would be evidence of a pamdemic to you?The entire virus in isolation.
No Canadian province has provided evidence for a pandemic.Still waiting for this source that says they drooped it because Canada didn't provide any scientific evidence covid is dangerous.When you have no proof of a scientific nature in order to justify prior measures and are asked to provide it, but do not, then the reason why you are dropping it is evident.Tuberculosis and lung cancers are also respiratory illnesses that aren’t flus.Alberta is taking the same approach as it would to any other respiratory illness.
That is a fact.
Context matters. They are taking this approach because of the vaccine.
When you have no proof of a scientific nature in order to justify prior measures and are asked to provide it, but do not, then the reason why you are dropping it is evident.Tuberculosis and lung cancers are also respiratory illnesses that aren’t flus.Alberta is taking the same approach as it would to any other respiratory illness.
That is a fact.
Context matters. They are taking this approach because of the vaccine.
Tuberculosis and lung cancers are also respiratory illnesses that aren’t flus.Alberta is taking the same approach as it would to any other respiratory illness.
Flu is a respiratory illness.Correct.Which is to treat it like a flu, which it is.
Incorrect.
Flus are not coronaviruses. This is a category error.
Correct.Which is to treat it like a flu, which it is.
Incorrect.
David FreiheitQuoteThe health authority was subpoenaed, the government wrote they had nothing in regards to science to justify government mandated restrictions.
Source?
I doubt the authenticity, considering the link from which it was derived.https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.203235/gov.uscourts.cod.203235.136.0.pdfLOL! This document is to be taken as legitimate?
First set of sanctions against lawyers pushing lies about election fraud.
Uhhh… Of course it is. It’s a judge’s decision.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.203235/gov.uscourts.cod.203235.136.0.pdfLOL! This document is to be taken as legitimate?
First set of sanctions against lawyers pushing lies about election fraud.
Could have more to do with your inability to think, than my understanding of the meaning of words.fascist
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
This is something that a teen who has just learned about politics for the first time would say!^Cue fascist rant.
The anti-vaccine crowd do sound like annoying teenagers.^This is spot on. The fascists do want everyone to get the vaccine, and will resort to name calling and shaming first, then force if necessary.
You wrote the mRNA vaccines were based "largely on previous vaccines." How could that possibly be?The vaccine is largely based on previous vaccines and they are extremely confident that there aren’t long term side effects.The vaccine was the first of its kind ever used on humans.
The mRNA COVID vaccines were given the largest human trials of any vaccine in history. Plase 1, 2 and 3 trials for mRNA vaccines were underway before the COVID pandemic had begun. Just because it was the first of it's kind, does not mean it is untested or unsafe.
You can read more here.mRNA vaccines have been around and experimented for use in oncology, not for virology.
Yeah, we all get it.QuoteOver 16,000 dead from the vaccine in the US. Thousands more injured permanently.
These figures using the VAERS data which is not confirmed data, as they say when you download or search the data from their site. They also do not confirm that any death reported is caused by the vaccine. With over 350M doses administered, there is certainly going to be deaths proximal to, but not caused by, the vaccine injection. However, even if you decide to take these figures at face value, which is a bad idea, the vaccine is still a net positive for the population. 16,000 deaths < 600,000 deaths.
Already done.A source for what?
I suggest you learn the definition of the word, "guidance," before you post again.
The government pays the hospital if Covid is the cause of death.
Administrators want the money.
And will not follow "guidance."
In the US, yes, for Medicare patients, the government pays the hospital for Covid services rendered. I'm not finding where the Gov't is paying something or anything extra for non-Medicare Covid patients. Please cite a source.
You are now claiming that hospitals are not getting any monies related to Covid deaths unless the patients were on Medicare?
That is up to you, the claimant, to provide the source.
Actually no, you need to provide a source for your statement, "The government pays the hospital if Covid is the cause of death." That is your claim.
No, and you know it.Yeah, right.Just like you wouldn't follow "guidance," if I dropped my wallet on the ground and you found it.
Demonstrable lack of conscience found in your post history.
Wow, this says more about your conscience than mine - I once found a wallet on the sidewalk. It had some cash, like $60+, a University ID and some credit/debitcards. I scoured the web for the individual based on the ID. Found her father's info, called him up, he said it was her daughter's. She was visiting here from school, he lived locally. He came by and picked up the wallet, cash included.
Sounds like your your sense of guidance is severely warped & selfish - Makes sense given your stance on this topic.
Don't believe that one bit.
And your virtue signaling is just hypocritical BS.
Are you saying, as your default MO, that if you found a wallet on the street that you wouldn't try to return it to its owner, contents intact?
Yeah, it is only spite that prevents you from you reading.Read the thread.
Read.
So it's spite, got it.