If you are trying to say that Kepler's laws are not applicable to other celestial bodies, satellites or any orbiting mass, you would be wrong.
I would be absolutely correct, unless you're willing to demonstrate that the moon's orbit is an ellipse with the sun at one of the two foci.
Given that Gulliver's claim is a pedantic attack on the 10% amplitude in the RET moon's orbit's radius (which belongs to the same school of unnecessary points as
but FE isn't really flat because hills exist lol! or
RE isn't really round because it's actually an oblate spheroid hehehe), it's only fair that we call him out on his "obvious mistakes" too. He needs to learn that he will not be taken seriously if he behaves like this.
I also quite like how he keeps referring to the very non-specific "claims about 180° and such". He's not even capable of repeating what Tintagel said accurately, let alone construct a coherent response.