The only thing I asked you to prove is that there is in fact a roadster in orbit. Instead of saying "I can't" you'd rather post incorrectly about fallacies
OK, fine. I'll admit it. I can't prove it. You win. The earth is flat. Well done.
But...hang on, can you prove the existence of the "shadow object" which no-one has ever observed but apparently in your model causes lunar eclipses?
And if your response is "well, something must be casting the shadow" then my retort is "Yes, it's the earth but in your model the sun and moon are both above the plane so you had to make up some object in between them to try and explain it". I'm talking to myself now so I'll stop.
Point is, I cannot prove there is a roadster in space (not in orbit actually, isn't it just heading for outer space?).
How can I possibly prove that absolutely? It's a ridiculous thing for you to ask. But there are a load of things you can't prove about your flat earth model either
One thing you
could prove is the distance to the sun or moon with some observations and triangulation, it's telling that my repeated suggestions about this have been met with a stony silence.
What I can say quite confidently is there was a rocket launch. It's all on film, there were numerous witnesses many of whom took their own footage.
I've not heard any reports of anyone who saw the rocket come down anywhere - apart from those boosters which landed again as intended.
It was all live streamed so there is plenty of video of the whole thing.
So on the balance of probabilities it seems to me that this happened and there is indeed a roadster in space right now.
There is clearly no way of proving this absolutely but you could say that about anything.
Could it all have been faked? Well, the launch not. The live stream, maybe not completely impossible but technically difficult I would suggest.
The question for you though is do you have any evidence or proof of fakery?
What reason do you have to doubt it happened?
And it seems to me the answer to that is that if you accepted this really happened then it would mean you have to abandon your flat earth beliefs.
And you're so invested in it that cognitive dissonance is not letting you do that.
So rather than consider this new evidence and re-evaluating your beliefs about the shape of the earth you have to dismiss this as fake.
This is not healthy scepticism, it's just denial.
If I'm wrong and you have some actual evidence that it was faked then please present it so I and others can evaluate it.