Lovely, putting words in my mouth. Let me clarify:
I am not worried about TIME magazine pissing China off and causing them to retaliate against America. I'm worried they'll see the article and decide to escalate and bring Hong Kong back into full control of Mainland China, killing all who stand in their way, not just protesters.
Ah, the classic "a magazine brought attention to bad things we're doing so we'll choose the objectively worst option to deal with this" approach to governing. It happens all the time, on whatever world Dave lives on, one I assume is very far away from mine.
l
As opposed to 'On no, our people are protesting, lets deal with it in the worst possible way: kill them'.
Seriously, do you really think China thinks brining all of HK back under its full control with violence is a bad idea to them?
I'm sorry, at what point did I say all of twitter needed to be no fun zone? Also, when did I say all poloticians can't have fun? You can have dignified fun. I realize thats a foreign concept to you, but its true.
And now we've reached a point where you're making lines in the sand about what is and isn't fun, then getting angry that some people are having fun with things you think shouldn't be fun. "Entertainment is only what I say it is" - Lord "Supreme Cultural Dictator" Dave
*Sigh* If you wanna have fun shitposting, go ahead. I don't give a damn. If you become an elected official or someone with actual influence instead of an unkown little shitposter on twitter, then I'll care.
Just curious, what did you find funny about it? And why do you think they were making a joke? Because I didn't get any impression from the tweet that it was meant to be funny.
Like, if he posted something about hanging democrats, would that be funny too?