Here is a link to related news. However, in the spirit of our multi-political users, I have decided to make headlines based on various political bias. Just so no one feels left out.
Protester shot and killed by driver.
Texas driver opened fired on crowded street, killing 1.
Driver protects himself from heavily armed protester.
Patriot, exercising his 2nd amendment rights, killed by driver.
Lawful gun owner killed by driver.
Lawful gun owner murders peaceful protester.
All these headlines are factually true. Just different spins.
This underlines the problem. The biased press, yes all of them, put their own spin on every event.
Of course this case being in Texas the driver was well within his rights to cap the guy that stuck an AK in his face. In New York he would get life for defending himself.
Except he didn't stick an AK in his face. He walked down a street holding an AK. The driver was in a god damn car and was in no actual danger.
Sure he was, totally peaceful and the evil driver murdered him.
1. Not evil, scared.
Since the witnesses say the man approached the car (that was being attacked) with the gun he was within his rights to defend himself.
Walking down a street is approaching the car, I guess. Buuutttt unless you wanna show me evidence that the protestor looked like he was gonna shoot the guy (gun raised) I'm not buying it.
I notice you hammered on that idiot kind in Wisconsin that killed 2 people for bringing a gun yet not a peep about the dead guy that brought an AK. Hmm, bias much?
Of course not. That wasn't the topic of discussion.
But I'm seeing you seem to think a kid posing as a protector with a gun is ok but a protestor with one isn't. Hmmm... Bias much?
2. 2nd Amendment rights to self defense by open carry apparently only apply to Republicans.
Not even close, everyone has a right to carry in Texas unless otherwise restricted by federal law. And who said anyone was a republican? Only idiots identify with a party.
And yet it got someone killed. Funny how that works out. Seems people think other people with guns are threatening. Go figure!
Its called reading comprehension, you should look into it. You are trying like hell to knee jerk me into a corner but failed miserably. I don't think any of them should have been open carrying. I am very much on the other side on open carry, it is needlessly provacativce and like we can see, dangerous.
You and I were not there and the witnesses say the dead guy approached the car but you still insist you know what happened. Just walking down the street and got shot. I am sure you also know exactly what happened in every case that hits the news.
Seems people think other people with guns approchaing a car that is under attack are threatening. Go figure!