9061
Earth Not a Globe Workshop / Re: The Conspiracy Chapter Notes
« on: May 27, 2015, 08:50:18 AM »
A good question on the topic of peer review:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=24213.msg524560#msg524560
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=26775.msg614280#msg614280
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=24213.msg524560#msg524560
I can't remember who peer reviewed "Earth Not a Globe". Maybe Tom can tell us?
After Rowbotham published ENAG there was a monthly journal published called "Earth Not a Globe Review" which peer reviewed Rowbotham's claims.
What unconnected third-party peer reviewed NASA's claims?
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=26775.msg614280#msg614280
If NASA were to allow skeptics to peer review their claims, research, and materials it would go a long way to giving them a modicum of credibility. Peer review is a fundamental tenant of modern science.
If NASA's work is not peer reviewed by an unconnected party it's not science. It's a story.