FE will answer that with EA and bendy light.
There is so much wrong with the bendy light hypothesis it's difficult to know where to start.
The monopole map is accurate in the N-S direction.
In terms of distances, it may well be. The problem for FET comes from the measured 'altitude' (ie elevation angle) of polaris from different points. If you stand at the north pole and look for Polaris, you will see it almost directly above you, at essentially 90 degrees (it's actually a touch under, but never mind), hence your latitude of 90N. If I'm at the southern tip of Greenland, 60N, and you phone me up and ask for a sighting on Polaris, I'll measure it at 60 degrees. That has to work for FET too. The problem for FET though is that, because you and I are allegedly standing on the same flat surface, we should be able to triangulate and thereby measure the distance to Polaris. We're 1800 nautical miles apart, looking at something that subtends an angle of 30 degrees between us. It must be 3600nm to Polaris.
But the problem now is that if I go to 30N and repeat the exercise, there is now 3600nm between me and you and I'm sighting Polaris at 30 degrees, which means Polaris must be 4157 miles away. We get a different result depending on where we sight from.
So, presumably, at this point the FET proponents would invoke bendy light (although the wiki seems to invoke perspective, which just makes no sense whatsoever, as the angular distance between the stars remains the same). So your sighting at the north pole is correct, because the wiki EA page shows the lines going vertically up, but then the light curves as I get closer and closer to the equator. So my challenge to the FET proponents is to come up with a definitive rule for the EA curvature that completely explains the apparent positions of the various stars, as well as the sun and the moon, which we know to be close to the earth as it obscure the stars. The truth is that they can't, because you would require different curvatures to explain different things in different places. Moreover, this magical correcting curvature would be easily testable - you could just shine a light across a long flat surface and observe a measurable curvature. But of course that doesn't happen, because EA doesn't exist, and the earth isn't flat.