Junker....
OK... It is a bit hard to get a grasp on what you are saying. You come across like someone defending FE, in multiple post, then you say you never said that....
Can you provide more detail on this? Or give examples of me exhibiting what you claim here?
It is obvious that you would balk at doing the one thing that would prove to you the earth is round. No I am not going to do it for you...
This suggestion is neither original nor reasonable. You are either trolling, or don't understand the cost or availability relative to such an idea. How would you suggest someone go about arranging such a venture? Where can I go buy a ticket today? We frequently hear from RErs that space tourism is going to be taking off (no pun intended) any time now, yet it hasn't and there isn't much hope at least in the near future.
I think you mean that you (allegedly) aim a dish at the sky. Unless you have evidence otherwise...
That really doesn't even make sense... Are you saying I am lying, and that I don't do that? You are aware of satellite TV providers, that install a dish on your house? Are they all out there installing fake dishes and the people actually get their TV through magic???
If you take a minute or two to read the words, it actually does make sense. No, I did not say you are lying, as evidenced by a lack of me ever saying that. Yes, I know that satellite TV providers install dishes on houses. I am not sure why you would insinuate I think the dishes are fake, as I also never said that, so please don't put words in my mouth.
Quote
If not a satellite, please tell me what I am aiming at....
Probably could be several things. However, asking me to provide your evidence is a bit silly.
I hadn't read that one till now.... That makes even less sense, you're really not all there are you???
I am sorry following simple logic makes "less sense" to you. You are the one coming in here making claims about what you do and how certain you are about what your dish is pointing at. All I did was ask for some evidence which you failed to provide.
I know I aim at a satellite, and I can prove, with geometry how high in the sky it is (let me guess, math is a scam/conspiracy...).
Fantastic, now we are getting somewhere. Please share some of the data you have relative to your setup that will prove what you are pointing at. We actually love maths here, but please continue to provide baseless conjecture, as it only makes your claims weaker (not that they can get much weaker at this point anyway).
You can't stand next to someone with a red car, and say I don't believe it is red, and tell him he is the one that needs to come up with proof that it is red. You are the one claiming the red car isn't red, and you need to provide proof it isn't.
I don't think you understand how analogies work, as that is not even a remotely equivalent scenario (if you need help with understanding why it isn't remotely equivalent, just ask, I'd be happy to help). You also don't seem to understand how the burden of proof works. The only one making a claim in this scenario is you. Therefore, it is up to you to provide proof for your claim. I haven't said anything about what your claim "isn't," yet you are asking me to prove a negative about something I never said. I would suggest working on your understanding of this a bit more before you try again. It would make the conversation more productive.
And you avoided the question of if not a satellite, what am I aiming at? and how would it "float" up there.
I'd need to know more about your setup, but it could be pointing at stratellites, ground-based towers, or something else. Again, I don't know for sure, which is why I am asking you to prove your claim.