You claim that he was forced to say he went to space, or that he was tricked. Do you have any proof?
It's a simple process of deduction. He claims to have gone into space. One cannot actually go into space. Therefore, he is lying. Why is he lying? Well, he had a long phone call with a prominent world leader who was associated with the NASA conspiracy. Therefore, it is logical to conclude that he was in some way influenced by the conspiracy. Perhaps they threatened his family. Perhaps they offered him money. Perhaps they knew about what he did that time in Thailand. We can only speculate.
What you just did there is a fatal flaw in logic deduction. Although you call it simple, you do not seem to grasp its mechanics. When you made the statement "One cannot actually go into space" you assumed that he is lying. This immediately invalidates your logic. Although your conclusion might be correct, this is not a proof. Unless you have empirical evidence that it is not possible to go into space, your "logic" is void.
Well, yes. The laws of physics as defined by Flat Earth Theory state that space travel is impossible. As experimental evidence clearly points toward Flat Earth Theory, there must be an alternative explanation for supposed space travel. Occam's Razor suggests that they're simply lying.
And yet you still miss the point. The very fact that you say that space travel is impossible assumes that the FET is true. Therefore, you cannot use this argument.
No, you are missing the point. A starting premise of my argument is indeed that the Earth is flat. This is because this premise has been previously proven. We don't need to reinvent the wheel here.
Besides, we're discussing Flat Earth Theory. If you'd prefer, we can use the modifier "assuming the Earth is flat, this phenomenon is explainable because" in front of every sentence. However, this would be a massive waste of everyone's time.
You are correct. IF we assume that the Earth is flat, THEN we can make certain statements. This is a standard conditional statement. If you look at the original comment that started this discussion, then you will see that BillyBob wants PROOF. Instead of proving anything to him, you asserted "One cannot actually go into space." You have no right to this assertion because BillyBob assumes that FET is false (or at least that is how I understood it).
I would also like to see the proof of why the Earth is flat. It would be interesting to look at.
Instead of taking his question seriously, you instead brushed it aside. I would have expected better from you.
Also if space travel is impossible, what are all these satelites I see through my telescope?