Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Define "eye-level".
And also, we've discussed this at length before and the flat earthers didn't understand any of the evidence presented.
Wasn't there an experiment performed a short while ago that soundly disproved this, using a u-tube filled with coloured water?
I'm starting to think alot of Round Heads are Liberals ...
... it is obviously CGI. It's just another plot by nasa to convert us to Globeheads.
This isn't really a debate topicAstutely observed. Treep is a fairly transparent troll who does not appear to be interested in debate.
Equinox is just the sun passing the equatorial plane, its not a fixed point.
Wait, I've thought that we understand gravity very well... What did I miss?
Not needed. Look below.
VID
It's a 7 year long research done by many scientists to find the real shape of our earth. They're either all very good liars or we actually live on a flat earth where BIGGER LIERS have constructed a false "Global" reality to hid something from us. I wouldn't be surpised, ONE BIG LIE (Moon landing) and all the puffed up pride has just led to series of lies that have gone too far (that's it's not funny anymore).
Here you go.
VID
It's a 7 year long research done by many scientists to find the real shape of our earth.
There's no proof they are or were "scientists". No statement of qualifications, no indication of what work they've done, etc.
They're either all very good liars or we actually live on a flat earth where BIGGER LIERS have constructed a false "Global" reality to hid something from us. I wouldn't be surpised, ONE BIG LIE (Moon landing) and all the puffed up pride has just led to series of lies that have gone too far (that's it's not funny anymore).
Here you go.
VID
It's a 7 year long research done by many scientists to find the real shape of our earth.
There's no proof they are or were "scientists". No statement of qualifications, no indication of what work they've done, etc.
They're either all very good liars or we actually live on a flat earth where BIGGER LIERS have constructed a false "Global" reality to hid something from us. I wouldn't be surpised, ONE BIG LIE (Moon landing) and all the puffed up pride has just led to series of lies that have gone too far (that's it's not funny anymore).
The Mean Solar Day does not fit into the number of Mean Solar Days in a Mean Solar Year.
The Mean Solar Day is 24 Hours Per Day and the Mean Solar Year is 365.24217 Mean Solar Days.
You are showing me systems and numbers that are not based on multiples.
I'm not manipulating anything. You will get whole numbers from units in measuring systems that are based on multiples.
... if you pick the multiples to fit the result you want
1 Barrel = 36 Gallons
1 Gallon = 4 Quarts
In this measuring system 4 and 36 share a common factor.
36 Gallons / 4 Quarts = 9. Whole Number. 4 will fit into 36. This fluid measuring system is constant (at least between these two entities).
Now:
1 Year = 360 Days
1 Day = 24 Hours
360 Days / 24 Hours = 15. Whole Number. 24 will fit into 360. This measurement system is constant.
Congratulations. You have calculated that one twenty-fourth of 360 = 15. Nothing else.
It is a good measuring system which gives consistent results when you manipulate it in this fashion.
It doesn't matter what you call the units, or the history on how it was defined. The numbers are multiples and therefore can be divided to get whole numbers.
If we had a system that was composed of multiples of 8 it would work as well.
1 SuperLegoBlock = 64 MegaLegoBlocks
1 MediumLegoBlock = 16 SmallLegoBlocks
64 MegaLegoBlocks / 16 SmallLegoBlocks = 4. Whole number.
It doesn't matter what you call it. 64 and 16 share a common multiple. Different "units" of this measuring system can be divided in this manner.
360 and 24 share a common multiple, and so these units, whatever you call them, can be divided. This measuring system is based on multiples. You can call it the Lego Block Measuring System or the Piles of Popcorn Measuring System. It is a good measuring system which gives consistent results when you manipulate it in this fashion.
You are saying that it's a "coincidence" that 360 is a multiple of 24.
No, I think you picked those figures to fit your calculation. No coincidence involved, other than in your head
But the reason for defining it that way doesn't matter. It's a multiple.
It's not just meaningless numbers being divided together.
I will attempt an explanation.
--- --- ---
Step 1.
If you take a circle that is 360 degrees around and imagine that each of those degrees had 24 sub units in it (lets call them Sub-Degrees), 24 Sub-Degrees should fit neatly into the 360 degree circle.
Yes, (24*360) 8640 of them will. 24 sub-degrees still only fills one degree, though.
360 degrees / 24 sub-degrees = 15
The reason for my example with dollars, dimes and the example with pennies and with miles, feet, and inches work to get whole numbers is because both are constant measuring systems.
...and our system of seconds, minutes, hours, days, etc isn't?
One works on multiples of 10 and the other system works on multiples of 8 (there is also the furlong between the gap of feet and miles, but no one uses that anymore).
Actually, someone does. Horse races are measured in furlongs.
My examples make sense.
There are many here who disagree
A large number of feet should divide into a whole number of inches.
etc etc
The whole cycle, seasons and all, should be divisible by the hour.