1
Flat Earth Community / Re: The Wall
« on: July 18, 2017, 02:19:38 PM »
What is the definition of THE Ice Wall? According to Bishop any iceberg is THE ice wall.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Please provide any fake image from NASA. Link to the image hosted on NASA website. Please no Youtube videos and shitty pictures from flattards.Flat Earth Theory must adjust for the commercial space program being real.
Its real in the sense that NASA are sending things up and those things are circling the earth.
But just like 911, I do not believe the NASA narrative, too many faked vids and pictures.
It just reeks of conspiracy, even to non flat earthers, at least we have an answer for it.
I don't believe you don't understand it.Bishop, you aren't serious about that, right? Ever heard of a spherical sky map? The straight lines just don't work.
Woof, you guys need to study a bit of math really. You draw conclusions like a 1-grade boy. Do you have B.Sc degree in anything technical?
Fictitious premise. The sky is not a sphere which things rest against.
What I gather, then, is that it's different from science in that it postulates no hypotheses, merely makes observations and then seeks to explain those observations. So the great Rowbotham observed that the surfaces of bodies of water are flat, and concluded that therefore the Earth must be flat.Hi there!
So I should take it on your authority that this is actually a space station?You can go to one of the monthly star parties (always at new moon). Astronomers are really friendly. They will show you ISS and maybe even HST. Then when you this in the eyepiece:
Here's my theory on satellites:The most important point you miss is the conspiracy! If those are satellites and they are above and they take pictures of the earth then what all NASA pictures are real? You are not a genuine flat earther!
I think that they are above us, BUT they orbit around the top of FE like the sun and moon.
I'd like to hear your thoughts on it and feel free to say your opinion on satellites
Come on, our explanations for those things are easily found in the literature and Wiki.Quote- Moon in the southern hemisphere is upside-down. How can it be on a flat earth?
This is explained in the Wiki. In FET this is explained by the different observers standing on either side of the moon. On one side it is right-side up, and on the other side it is upside down.
Imagine a green arrow suspended horizontally above your head pointing to the North. Standing 50 feet to the South of the arrow it is pointing "downwards" towards the Northern horizon. Standing 50 feet to the North of the arrow, looking back at it, it points "upwards" above your head to the North. The arrow flip-flops, pointing down or away from the horizon depending on which side you stand.
I came across a youtube video which asks some interesting questions about the angles of the sun and moon.Bishop, you aren't serious about that, right? Ever heard of a spherical sky map? The straight lines just don't work.
Yea but the point is being able to see Jupiter, is not proof the aether doesn't exist.OK. My original point was as foolows: Disappearing due to dense air doesn't work. Why? Because everything disappears at the horizon no matter how faint it is. If the atmosphere was responsible for disappearing, the fainter the object was the earlier (read farther away from the horizon) it would disappear. But what we see is that enormously bright Sun disappears exactly at the same place where all faint stars are disappearing.