Clearly, you are thoroughly wrong.
I don't think so. The issue was put forth before the State Senate prior to the court proceedings and subsequent Judge's ruling. I'm not sure one could call it an "impeachment" vote, by name alone, but it had the same stripes, as it were, as one - i.e., Removal from office:
On November 22, the Pennsylvania Senate reconvened. The President of the Senate, Lt. Gov. Mark S. Singel, a Democrat, ruled that Stinson was properly seated. Sen. Robert C. Jubelirer, a Republican, objected, claiming that the Board's certification of Stinson was invalid. The Senate voted 25-24 that Stinson was "eligible to vote on his own seating in the Senate," with Stinson casting the decisive vote. The Senate then voted 25-24 that Stinson was "properly seated as a member of the Pennsylvania Senate," with Stinson again casting the decisive vote. See Jubelirer v. Singel, 638 A.2d 352 (1994) ( en banc). Had the vote gone the Republican's way, Stinson would have been "unseated" from the State Senate. Essentially removed from office - The same result as an impeachment.
Again, this was all prior to the court proceedings and subsequent Judge's ruling.