EA is testable and has been tested.
Wait...what do you mean it is "testable" and has been "tested" ? By whom? Where? How? Can you point to an experiment that shows electromagnetic acceleration or somehow proves it, when you don't even have something more than "an approximate formula" ?
Here's some quotes from the Wiki article on EA (
https://wiki.tfes.org/Electromagnetic_Acceleration) -
"Therefore,
while [this equation describing EA] is not valid for short-range experiments, it can give an idea of how much sunlight would bend on its way to the Earth, for instance." [emphasis added].
"When the theory is complete,
attempts will be made to measure this experimentally." [emphasis added].
Searching for any tests or experiments in the EA page of the Wiki turns up nothing.
My guess, based on your posting behavior, is that you'll first belligerently claim that I don't know how to do a search (while not actually giving me any links to an EA test or experiment), and then, in a later post, you'll refer to the "Articles of Interest" section on the EA page.
To jump ahead in the conversation, I'll therefore assume your statement that "EA is testable and has been tested" refers to these articles. Here's my response to that:
Summary:Those two articles don't show tests of what the EA page depicts or describes at all, other than both have to do with "bending light."
IThe equation that is at the center of this thread defines the Bishop constant as "the magnitude of the acceleration on a horizontal light ray
due to Dark Energy." [emphasis added].
Neither of those articles mention anything close to dark energy as a factor in any of it.
IIThe first article states that "a specially shaped laser beam [was generated] that could self-accelerate, or bend, sideways."
But the sun isn't a laser and doesn't emit focused light like a laser. Nor does the moon. If you can only find a test that light from this one "specially shaped laser" bends, not unfocused light such as sunlight, you haven't tested EA.
IIIThe same article then states "The researchers did not bend the laser beam as a whole but rather the high-intensity regions within it."
EA, as described in the Wiki, doesn't say anything about applying to "high-intensity regions" of the light. It describes it as referring to all sunlight and moonlight.
IVThe very first sentence in the EA Wiki states "there is a mechanism to the universe that pulls, pushes, or deflects light upwards. All light curves upwards over very long distances."
The article describes the experiment in these words: "To do this they passed a centimetre-wide ordinary laser beam through a device known as a spatial light modulator that adjusted the phase of the beam at thousands of points across its width. Rather than acting like a lens and focusing all of the beam’s constituent rays to a single point, the modulator instead changed the relative phase of the rays such that their interference produced a region of maximum intensity that curved sideways in the shape of a gentle parabola across the beam as it propagated forward, along with a number of fainter regions on one side."
This is not describing long distances. They had to modify the relative phases of the light rays for the light to bend. EA says nothing about phases (The Wiki on EA uses the word "phase" nine times, but always in reference to lunar phases, not phases of a wave, which is what this article is referring to.).
For this to line up with EA, the "mechanism" that EA refers to which bends light "up" would have to be changing the phases of the rays of light from the sun and moon. The sunlight as depicted in the EA diagrams shows fairly straight rays for 12pm, and more curved ones for 6am. Can't we measure the light from the sun in various time zones and see if something like this is happening with the phases of the light frequencies hitting the earth?
VThe Wiki summarizes the first article as "A University of Central Florida research team demonstrated light beams which could self-accelerate, or bend, and were non-diffracting."
The same article later states "the authors do not make it clear that in their experiments they are not bending light rays themselves but the rays’ envelopes, or “caustics”."
A laser caustic is "The envelope of light rays reflected or refracted by a curved surface or object, such as a lens."
Source:
https://www.ophiropt.com/user_files/laser/beam_profilers/Laser_Vocabulary.pdfConclusionThese articles do not describe EA at all.
Maybe I really do just suck at searching. But the EA article does not use the words "test" or "testable" anywhere, and I quoted near at the top of this post the only two times it refers to anything experimental being done.
And this section never refers to Electromagnetic Acceleration even once:
https://wiki.tfes.org/Experimental_EvidenceShow me the way, Pete.