He's an elected official in the State of Arizona and the majority whip.
Irrelevant.
His responsibility is to act as a voice for his constituents and to mobilize votes in the State Senate on major issues.
Irrelevant.
The people voted for him to be there. He represents their views. As an elected official and decision maker for a legislative body he is an arbiter of determining appropriate experts.
So not an expert, got it.
If Republicans are unhappy about voter fraud it is because their constituents are unhappy about voter fraud.
An absolute bull shit idea. Politicians act in their own interest or against the interest of their constituents all the time.
Obviously an audit orchestrated by the people who would have conducted the fraud and would go to jail for it if caught isn't going to fly.
You have evidence the audit agencies committed fraud?
Innocent people don't refuse to obey subpoenas by the Senate and risk arrest.
You should be concerned that the Senate is requesting private records they have no legal right to, instead you focus on the election commission not obeying the Senate.
If Democrats think that a Senate audit would involve shenanigans there are legal remedies for exposing that. Planting evidence of a crime is highly illegal. The right thing to do is to let the Senate run its audit and confirm that the people running the election and the machines performed an accurate count.
It’s not the Senate’s right or duty to audit elections, for obvious reasons. It would be a terrible conflict of interest for an elected official to audit their own election. But you don’t care. Anything to get Trump back in by March 4th.