Pages: < Back  1 ... 128 129 [130] 131 132 ... 566  Next >   Go Down
*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3357
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2580 on: February 01, 2018, 04:50:20 PM »
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y
*

Offline Ghost Spaghetti

  • *
  • Posts: 908
  • Don't look in that mirror. It's absolutely furious
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2581 on: February 02, 2018, 09:00:03 AM »
Good God, he is such a narcissist
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2582 on: February 02, 2018, 09:04:31 AM »
Quote from: Ghost Spaghetti on February 02, 2018, 09:00:03 AM
Good God, he is such a narcissist
Fox probably said it and thus, it becomes fact for Trump.

If Fox and Friends said Trump was a steaming pile of shit, he'd probably tweet about how much of a shit Trump is.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2583 on: February 02, 2018, 07:50:02 PM »
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/president-approves-release-of-gop-memo-criticizing-fbi-surveillance/2018/02/02/699eb988-06cf-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html?utm_term=.ca884501b817

So the memo was released.

Summary from what I can tell:
-Steele thinks Trump should't be president.  (So like 50% of America)
-Republicans wrote the memo saying OMG, this is sooo bad!  How could the FBI hire anyone who hated Trump?!
-Republicans release memo they wrote that badmouths the FBI and calls it evidence of the FBI being corrupt.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline garygreen

  • *
  • Posts: 3237
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2584 on: February 04, 2018, 06:29:14 PM »
https://www.lawfareblog.com/dubious-legal-claim-behind-releasethememo

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/372207-gowdy-memo-has-no-impact-on-russia-probe
Quote
"There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica."

He added that the dossier has "nothing to do with George Papadopoulos's meeting in Great Britain."

"It also doesn't have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there's going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier," he said.

I have visited from prestigious research institutions of the highest caliber, to which only our administrator holds with confidence.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2585 on: February 04, 2018, 06:42:45 PM »
But but!
The memo totally proves that Trump is being vindicated by democrats who hate him.  How could anyone not see that?
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2586 on: February 05, 2018, 10:00:07 PM »
https://www.npr.org/2018/02/05/583447413/trump-democrats-un-american-treasonous-during-state-of-the-union

So apparently not applauding for the president is treasonous.  Yet another line our president has crossed.  What's next?  Declaring martial law to round up the traitors?
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Snupes

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1957
  • Counting wolves in your paranoiac intervals
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2587 on: February 06, 2018, 03:45:25 AM »
But but he only said "well someone else called it treasonous and maybe it is, kinda seems like it" so he only heavily implied it's treasonous. That makes it better.
Quote from: Thork on April 19, 2015, 10:53:35 AM
There are cigarettes in joints. You don't smoke it by itself.
*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4193
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2588 on: February 06, 2018, 03:50:07 AM »
He was just testing the waters. Is not giving the President a standing ovation treasonous? Who can say?
Quote from: Tom Bishop on August 13, 2021, 02:44:29 AM
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2589 on: February 06, 2018, 07:10:11 AM »
Its like he doesn't realize he's president of America....
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16080
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2590 on: February 06, 2018, 01:26:17 PM »
Quote from: Roundy on February 06, 2018, 03:50:07 AM
He was just testing the waters. Is not giving the President a standing ovation treasonous? Who can say?
Surely supporting the Commander in Chief is just a logical extension of Supporting Our Troops™. And if you don't Support Our Troops™, you may as well be a Soviet.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

Quote from: Rama Set on April 07, 2023, 06:16:50 PM
If we are not speculating then we must assume
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2591 on: February 06, 2018, 01:43:03 PM »
Quote from: Pete Svarrior on February 06, 2018, 01:26:17 PM
Quote from: Roundy on February 06, 2018, 03:50:07 AM
He was just testing the waters. Is not giving the President a standing ovation treasonous? Who can say?
Surely supporting the Commander in Chief is just a logical extension of Supporting Our Troops™. And if you don't Support Our Troops™, you may as well be a Soviet.
Soviets support their troops.  You know who doesn't?  Dirty hippy liberals.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4193
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2592 on: February 06, 2018, 04:27:01 PM »
Insisting for years with no evidence that our president wasn't born in this country and should be removed from office? Perfectly fine. Not clapping for the president when he gives a speech? HIGH TREASON.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on August 13, 2021, 02:44:29 AM
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2593 on: February 06, 2018, 06:15:16 PM »
Quote from: Roundy on February 06, 2018, 04:27:01 PM
Insisting for years with no evidence that our president wasn't born in this country and should be removed from office? Perfectly fine. Not clapping for the president when he gives a speech? HIGH TREASON.

See this is where you're wrong.
Republicans didn't clap for Obama when Obama said good news.  That's not treasonous.  It's only when Democrats do it to Trump.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16080
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2594 on: February 06, 2018, 06:28:01 PM »
Quote from: Roundy on February 06, 2018, 04:27:01 PM
Insisting for years with no evidence that our president wasn't born in this country and should be removed from office?
Whoah now, are you forgetting Obama's birth tape?

Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

Quote from: Rama Set on April 07, 2023, 06:16:50 PM
If we are not speculating then we must assume
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2595 on: February 06, 2018, 07:06:14 PM »
That is clearly Hawaii and if you tell me otherwise, you're wrong and stupid and unamerican.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline Snupes

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1957
  • Counting wolves in your paranoiac intervals
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2596 on: February 06, 2018, 10:16:18 PM »
Q. Has the president read the Democratic memo?
Kelly: “He has it. It’s pretty lengthy.”
Q. Has he read the whole thing?
Kelly: “No, no, I just gave it to him.”
Q. He’ll read it after this?
Kelly: “Oh, of course, yeah. We’ll get some people down to brief him on it.”

It's ten pages...that's like 10-20 minutes of reading at most.
Quote from: Thork on April 19, 2015, 10:53:35 AM
There are cigarettes in joints. You don't smoke it by itself.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2597 on: February 07, 2018, 11:52:35 AM »
It's more than two times bigger than the Nunes memo so naturally Trump can't read that.
Hell, I'd be shocked if he actually read the Nunes memo.


In other news:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02/07/583903933/trump-reportedly-wants-pentagon-to-stage-military-parade-down-pennsylvania-ave

Trump wants to one up the French by being just like the communists.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2018, 11:55:12 AM by Lord Dave »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3357
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2598 on: February 10, 2018, 09:20:03 PM »
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7672
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #2599 on: February 11, 2018, 06:41:04 AM »
Oh look, hypoctite Trump.  Also known as everyday Trump.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
Pages: < Back  1 ... 128 129 [130] 131 132 ... 566  Next >   Go Up