You: 'one observation'.
Me: 'millions of observations'
You: 'tiny details in my phrasing '
Yes. I obviously meant one
category of observation, which you chose to misinterpret. I'll be slightly more generous than yourself and assume that you simply didn't get my meaning - but then you had the simple option of asking.
The fact that plenty of observations contradict your model is what you should be addressing, but your best attempt at slithering away from this is attacking someone's use of language.
This is laughable
I agree - your dishonesty, inability to remain internally consistent, and finally poor attempts at taunting your opponent will join your attempt at faking your status as an academic when we next need to recall your behavioural patterns. We will laugh and laugh. And, as you astutely pointed out, it's all recorded and documented here.