I disagree that it's a given in the actual scenario we're discussing (and, as stated before, I'm not willing to engage in empty hypotheticals)
We're all just here trying to pursue the truth Pete. I was just trying to establish a foundation of truth using boolean logic so at least we could find something we can all agree on and then use that to build more truth upon. Since you won't even bring yourself to agree on the simplest base scenario, I'll bring it back to the actual scenario we are discussing.
Facts:
1) Flat Earther Claim: There is a space travel conspiracy. Humans have not been to space. Space travel is being faked. Space travel is false.
2) Space Agency Claim: They have traveled in space. Humans have been to space. Space travel is real.
3) In order for the Flat Earther claim to be valid reality, we can establish that the Space Agency's knowledge about space travel is a given. They know their organization has not traveled in space, since in reality it has not. They know their agency has not put humans in space, since in reality they have not. They know space travel is false and by virtue of this knowledge, they are forced to actively fake it to cover it up. They are liars. Their knowledge that space travel is false is precisely the foundation for the conspiracy. No knowledge, nothing to cover up, no conspiracy. Their knowledge is a given.
Which brings us back full circle to the logical imperative:
A) False is the opposite of True.
B) If space travel is False and if an organization knows it is False, yet claims it is True, that organization is a liar.
C) If 14 space agencies knowingly make False claims that space travel is True, all 14 organizations are liars.
You don't agree?