Obama was going to meet with Kim-Jong and give him a pallet full of cash.
Trump met with him a couple of times and said no money, except in the exploding bomb coming your way if you keep mouthing off...
So no...not Fox being hypocritical...
Although that would be a valid distinction, Fox was saying that it was wrong to meet a dictator, full stop, so your distinction doesn't really apply.
So, stating it is a "mistake," (and that is the ultimate length and breadth of the Fox comments offered in the video) = wrong in every instance, regardless of extenuating circumstances?
I think there is a clear distinction in how/when/why/who is doing the meeting.
They were doing it when he was campaigning before he even had a policy in place.
I think they turned out to be pretty forecasters in this instance.
To be honest, for someone who loves to criticize the status quo and offer a position that the entire establishment is corrupt, I have no idea why you think Fox News isn't a part of that.
You got to pay attention to the whole beast from afar...
Obama was going to meet with Kim-Jong and give him a pallet full of cash.
Source?
In one of the clips Fox News call him "Senator" so this was obviously before he was president when he was talking about the possibility of meeting.
Cut to Fox news howling with outrage at the very idea. But when Trump does it...
What is every government solution to every problem?
Bomb the shit out of it or throw a bunch of money at it.
Past performance is the best predictor of future performance.
i.e., Obama's response to Iran...fork over cash...
So no...not Fox being hypocritical...
I wonder when Orwell wrote 1984 he really thought that doublethink would become a thing.
#MakeOrwellFictionAgain.
You are calling me a proponent of Orwell?
LOL!
Why should I consider that an insult?
You would not consider it an insult if I called you a proponent of Malthus...