21
Flat Earth Theory / Re: New idea on observing Sigma Octantis from multiple locations
« Last post by mahogany on April 19, 2024, 12:05:36 AM »Your statement seems kind of ridiculous. Using a desktop solid glass magnifying dome as an acceptable model scheme to show how light behaves upon the flat Earth's surface would be like someone launching a desktop model rocket in their backyard and explaining that to be an acceptable model scheme to show how a rocket engine behaves in the vacuum of space.In what way, exactly, would the two be alike? Please detail the necessary aspects of both RET and FET to underline your argument.
The two are alike in that both would use highly inaccurate model setup's as a claimed "acceptable" model scheme.
In terms of other specific aspects of FET vs. RET it's difficult to know what to use as a basis for comparison, since there is no unifying FE model. Some FE models have firmament domes and some models do not; some FE models are represented as an infinite plane and other models are not; some FE models are represented as mono-pole and other models are not; some models are represented with Antarctica being a ring of ice around the perimeter of the flat earth plane with the North Pole in the center, while other models are not, etc.