If your arguments can be refuted in any manner, then they are not good enough arguments here. When you guys have something that cannot be refuted, start a thread, let us know, and we can have a look and close the website.
(this is leading somewhere...)
A fellow was stuck on his rooftop in a flood. He was praying to God for help.
Soon a man in a rowboat came by and the fellow shouted to the man on the roof, "Jump in, I can save you."
The stranded fellow shouted back, "No, it's OK, I'm praying to God and he is going to save me."
So the rowboat went on.
Then a motorboat came by. "The fellow in the motorboat shouted, "Jump in, I can save you."
To this the stranded man said, "No thanks, I'm praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith."
So the motorboat went on.
Then a helicopter came by and the pilot shouted down, "Grab this rope and I will lift you to safety."
To this the stranded man again replied, "No thanks, I'm praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith."
So the helicopter reluctantly flew away.
Soon the water rose above the rooftop and the man drowned. He went to Heaven. He finally got his chance to discuss this whole situation with God, at which point he exclaimed,
"I had faith in you but you didn't save me, you let me drown. I don't understand why!"
To this God replied, "I sent you a rowboat and a motorboat and a helicopter, what more did you expect?!"
You are that man
"show me irrefutable proof!"
"OK...well here's a bunch of photos from space"
"They're fake!"
"Umm. OK. You have no evidence for that but fine, here's some video of people in space on the ISS"
"That is staged using green screen/that're on wires"
"Right...OK, here's an interview of someone who has been to space. She's one of the few people rich enough to be a space tourist"
"She's lying"
"But..."
and so on.
ANY evidence can be refuted even if the objections are spurious or far fetched.
There is no such thing as irrefutable proof unless we are talking about mathemetical theorums which, in the limited language of mathemetics can be proven absolutely.
You are demanding a level of proof which does not exisst and it's a level you absolutely don't have for what I'm going to have to call your dogma, because that's what it is.
As I said, your mindset is summed up by the deleted Wiki page:
P1) If personally unverifiable evidence contradicts an obvious truth then the evidence is fabricated
P2) The Flat Earth is an obvious truth
So it's impossible to refute. You declare it an obvious truth (without basis) and so conclude everything showing it to be wrong is fabricated.
Telling us to "go research this" is not good enough. You need to do the research for your claim. You need to show, not tell
By the way, this is rich coming from someone who is repeatedly shown experiments which prove him wrong and dismiss them (see above) while refusing to do any research or experiments himself...