AATW said false beliefs can be dangerous and gave an explanation.
His explanation went to anti-vaxxers and not to FET.
He gave no explanation regarding why FET is dangerous.
I attempted to expand on the point to continue the conversation - although I'm certain you're bright enough to understand my general direction you'd rather just go NOPE, NAH, NU-UH to win some playground points.
Strawmanning.
You expanded on nothing.
You threw up a strawman, stating FET relies on holding to a global conspiracy.
It doesn't.
Playground points - none taken.
Pointing out the obvious flaws in your method of argumentation? = +1 to totallackey
Fine. I guess I could resort to referencing Mad Mike as being a danger to himself, but I won't.
Good, because it would be just as valid as stating FET belief is dangerous because it = antivaxxers beliefs.
Not true and demonstrably not true.
Perhaps this isn't the thread to do it, but I'd be interested in hearing your view on NASA RE: a FET without a global conspiracy. I've noticed you're a big fan of calling things nonsense without substantiating so I'd be interested to hear your view - maybe we take it to the lounge?
Edit: Adding in "WHY MY" and "DANGEROUS TO YOU" is a straw man. No one claimed your specific beliefs were dangerous to us personally.
And I notice you're a big fan of claiming I offer no substantial support for my points, which is patently untrue.
Every time I bring up a point counter to RE, I offer a possible explanation.
And it is typically substantial, with math or other real life examples of actual occurrences.
Thread to do it?
Your right. Another thread.
AATW stated that very thing in his post.
He very much stated FET belief = dangerous.
He has since backed off, but still is not being unequivocal about it.
You find it dangerous or you wouldn't write about it.
So, who do I pose a danger to if not you or AATW?