We do have a search engine that you are free to exploit or use as you wish to prove your round Earth theory.
So you have nothing more to say on this matter.
Have you looked out your window lately?
That's the only argument I have ever heard you put forward.
The distance to the horizon on a sphere is given by √((R+h)
2-R
2). Where R is the radius of the sphere and h is the height of your eyes above the sphere.
The angle between two vertical structures on on the surface of sphere is given by 180d/πR. Where d is the distance between the two structures.
If you were standing on a perfectly smooth sphere with a radius of 4000 miles and your eyes were a height of 1.7 metres above the surface of the sphere the horizon would be 2.9 miles away.
The distance between two vertical structures 2.9 miles apart on a sphere with a radius of 4000 miles is 0.04°. From your position to the horizon, the sphere would have curved through an angle of 0.04°, that wouldn't be visible to the naked eye.
If you were standing on a perfectly smooth sphere with a radius of 4000 miles what you would see is essentially an approximately flat circle with a radius of 2.9 miles. It would just seem like a flat plane.
On the Earth there are buildings, trees, hills and a whole host of other features. It is not obvious looking out your window that the Earth is round.
Can you please stop using this lame argument that has been debunked multiple times.