Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - honk

Pages: < Back  1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 78  Next >
1161
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: February 19, 2018, 04:51:44 AM »
A younger Jack Napier makes an appearance in the flashback to the murder of Bruce's parents, and he's played by a different actor.

One who didn't look all that much like Nicholson:



This was also a dumb idea. I've always disliked it when adaptations try to play up the Wayne murders as being more than just a mugging gone wrong, like revealing that it was a deliberate assassination and/or part of an elaborate conspiracy. Batman's war is against crime in general, not this one specific criminal who committed this one specific crime some time ago. Tying it all the villain of the movie turns things personal in a bad way. And even setting my fanboyism aside, it was a lazy addition to the movie that added almost nothing to the conflict between Batman and the Joker. How could it, when the Joker has no idea who Batman even is? The comics handled the idea of Batman confronting his parents' killer much better:



Justice League (Zack Snyder/Joss Whedon, 2017)

Wow. Watched it with my friends. That may be the worst DC movie I've seen. I'm so burned out I don't even want to write about it. Writing was trash, Barry was cringe, Batman was useless, Cyborg looked awful, Aquaman was cringey dudebro, Wonder Woman was ok, Superman was OP. The story is everyone is useless until Zack Snyder wanks Superman to life, has him show up everyone, then win everything. End movie.

That was bad.

Come on, it wasn't as bad as BvS or SS.

1162
When the Wright Brothers were first experimenting with flight / powered flght, they likely never could have imagined that technology would advance to Jumbo Jets (like the A380) being able to carry hundreds of passengers at a time and over long trans-oceanic distances.

I'm sure they didn't. But in the years following the invention of the airplane, technological advancements and innovations flowed at a natural rate. Commercial airlines sprang up throughout the 1910s and 20s. Flight quickly became a key element of warfare. The jumbo jet wouldn't come around for a long time, true, but thousands of people all over the world were still directly witnessing and taking part in the phenomenon, all within just a few decades of the invention.

In contrast, commercial space travel is stagnant. It's been over sixty years since the first man supposedly flew in space, and yet the prospect is still as extraordinarily expensive, risky, and tightly-regulated as ever. What progress have these space entrepreneurs made? How are they any closer to launching space tourism as a viable industry than when Hughes first hawked the idea?

1163
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Fallout series
« on: February 15, 2018, 05:35:03 AM »
Thanks Saddam. The Blade Runner thing was already in Fallout 3. There's an android guy who don't know it in Rivet City and a Commonwealth science guy comes looking for him. It's a truly riveting tale.

I still don't understand why the "good" outcome of that quest was to remind the android who he really was, when he was the one who wanted his mind to be wiped in the first place.

Quote
Also, I posted up a sort of rewrite of my Fallout 4 review on my blog, but just talking about the writing, mostly.

Bethesda doesn't have a "writing staff." They don't hire professional writers to do their writing; they just have everybody write their own material as they go along. That's presumably how you get something like "Kid in a Fridge" alongside bizarre Lovecraftian fanfiction.

I don't quite agree with you about not spending enough time with the family, though. There are a number of games that rely on a brief scene establishing the relationship between the player character and a loved one to get the player invested in their fate, and they often work out just fine. For example, Splinter Cell: Conviction has a flashback to Sam Fisher comforting his young daughter that manages to be genuinely sweet without being overwrought, The Witcher 3 opens with a dream taking the form of a pseudo-flashback that shows us Ciri, a charming, likable character, and the kind of relationship she has with Geralt. And Red Dead Redemption doesn't give us any such scene at all, instead framing John Marston's relationship with his family entirely through his own words. Those games make what F4 so utterly failed at work not because they spent more time setting it up, but because their setups were competently scripted, written, and voiced. F4's beginning doesn't fail to resonate because it's short, or because we haven't seen enough of the lives of Nate, Nora, and Shaun. It fails because the characters are bland and one-dimensional, the dialogue is dull and uninspired, and the voice actors give bored, disinterested performances. Seeing more of their lives wouldn't change this. Ten times zero gives the same answer as one times zero.

1164
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sexual Scandals
« on: February 14, 2018, 03:13:41 AM »
Louis CK is a creep, no doubt. A lot of men are creeps. A lot. Just being a creep is not criminal, and it shouldn't be enough to lose your career over.

Exposing yourself to and jerking off in front of unconsenting women is not normal, not commonplace, and absolutely is criminal. C.K. has done this several times to multiple different women over the course of many years. He's not just a creep, he's a sex pest. Are you really, really using this guy as your example of someone who deserves lenience?

Quote
We should be better than this.

The irony.

From what I've been able to find he never forced himself on anyone, he just made some women feel uncomfortable. I'm sorry but it's a far cry from rape, and at least some of his accusers should have expected it, seeing as they were accompanying him to his hotel room. It's just silly to say he really did anything wrong.

The hotel room incident involved Dana Min Goodman and Julia Wolov, a professional comedy duo who had met C.K. after they had performed at a comedy festival. They weren't groupies, and they weren't there to have sex with him.

As to the rest of it, well, all I can say is that I very strongly disagree, and I imagine that most people would too.

1165
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sexual Scandals
« on: February 14, 2018, 12:07:55 AM »
Louis CK is a creep, no doubt. A lot of men are creeps. A lot. Just being a creep is not criminal, and it shouldn't be enough to lose your career over.

Exposing yourself to and jerking off in front of unconsenting women is not normal, not commonplace, and absolutely is criminal. C.K. has done this several times to multiple different women over the course of many years. He's not just a creep, he's a sex pest. Are you really, really using this guy as your example of someone who deserves lenience?

Quote
We should be better than this.

The irony.

1166
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: February 12, 2018, 04:25:27 AM »
That’s how old Jack Nicholson was when he played the Joker

EDIT: He was 50 actually.

Yeah, but that wasn't an...oh, shit, it was an origin story for the Joker! But at least it had Batman too. This is such a stupid idea.

1167
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sexual Scandals
« on: February 11, 2018, 04:51:59 PM »
Aziz Ansari's career hasn't been destroyed. He's going to bounce back from this just fine. Most of the people impacted by this will be fine. There's no way to say this without sounding like a conspiratard, but Hollywood just offered up Weinstein as a sacrifice. They don't care about any of these allegations.

And yeah, Louis CK absolutely deserved to have his career destroyed for what he did. I'm a little concerned that you'd mention him as an example of somebody being disproportionately punished. Of course, he'll probably have a triumphant comeback tour in a few years.

1169
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: February 09, 2018, 05:40:04 AM »
I kind of enjoyed it. I'm a bit of a DC nerd, though, so that might be a factor.



http://variety.com/2018/film/news/joaquin-phoenix-the-joker-origin-movie-todd-phillips-1202692188/

Joaquin Phoenix is in his forties! How's that going to work for an origin movie? This doesn't make sense. None of it makes any sense.

1170
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Fallout series
« on: February 06, 2018, 09:39:44 PM »
I will respond to Crudblud's mini-review here:

We start off with a couple of robots looking in a mirror, and you get to choose what the robots will look like. Every time you change something about one robot's face, both it and its fellow robot will comment on the change. After a few hundred "there's the handsome man I married"s and "I clean up pretty good"s I realised that, short of picking an entirely different preset to start with, there was very little I could do to make the man-robot not look like Jon Bernthal's derpy brother, and gave up.

You jest, but at one point during Far Harbor, a character actually tries to raise the question of whether or not you might be a synth yourself. Presumably this was because the folks at Bethesda had recently watched Blade Runner for the first time and wanted to impress upon the world just how deep and enlightened they were.

Quote
everyone except the protagonist is killed by Totally Not Hal 9000 during cryosleep. Yeah, the vaults have cryopods for no apparent reason, other than they really wanted to have the opening sequence be the day the bombs fell, and yet have you play the same guy in 2288 or whatever.

Vault 111 was outfitted with cryopods to study the effects of long-term suspended animation on unsuspecting human subjects. The other inhabitants were killed by the mercenary who abducted Shaun, only keeping you alive because of your genetic similarity to Shaun, which becomes important later.

Quote
But before that, before the robots shape-shifting and making the same three comments about it over and over in the bathroom, we of course have war. And you know what they say, war never changes. Oh my god. Three times this monotonous goon spouts the catchphrase in the first couple of minutes, and whoever directed the voice over clearly did not learn the Pinter pause lesson—if you tell the actor to pause, they will do it for too long. The space between "war" and "war never changes" must be something like five full seconds, the longest comma there ever was. And it's not like you don't know what he's about to say. There's nothing deep about it at this stage, if ever there was. It beggars belief. Not even Ron Perlman could have saved this pile.

He says it a fourth time if you open up your closet and look at your old uniform. Also:

<Saddam> War..........war never changes
<Crudblud> That fucking pause
<Crudblud> Why would you say that to yourself in the mirror anyway
<Crudblud> What a horribly written mess that is
<Saddam> Bethesda has no idea what it means
<Saddam> They can't even come up with a new meaning for it
<Crudblud> It's just a catchphrase people identify with the series
<Saddam> Like, I'm not saying there's one objective meaning to it that you have to fully understand or else you're wrong
<Saddam> But they don't even try to make it mean anything
<Crudblud> "Hey guys this is totally Fallout for reals haha war never changes haha war...war never changes! See? We're doing it! We're really doing it!"
<Saddam> It's an empty catchphrase
<Crudblud> It's worse because they have him say it so many fucking times
<Crudblud> I also love how they expected me to have any sort of attachment to people I'd spent all of five minutes with
<Crudblud> Like, even Taken Dad at least talked to you more than once
<Crudblud> They should have either made the intro sequence much longer or scrapped the frankly idiotic frozen for centuries storyline altogether
<Saddam> Heart-Wrenching Personal Story™
<Saddam> An ideal fit for a freeform RPG!
* SexWarrior (~John@cpc120900-sotn16-2-0-cust12.15-1.cable.virginm.net) has joined
* ChanServ gives channel operator status to SexWarrior
<Crudblud> It's amazing, they actually managed to do a worse job of their second attempt
<Crudblud> It's a shame, because the actual shooting things part of the game seemed pretty decent
<SexWarrior> Oh boy what's the disappointing game
<Crudblud> Fallout 4
<Crudblud> Well, "disappointing" would be the wrong word, my expectations were pretty low coming from F3
<Crudblud> But they improved the FPS aspect while making the RPG aspect even worse somehow

Quote
I touched a little on the way the game handles dialogue earlier, and it does definitely seem like what was annoying to look at in the pre-release gameplay footage is just as bad if not worse to actually play with. Each conversation point consists of you clicking on one of four preset options, none of which actually indicates what you're going to say. I thought the "yes" "no" "sarcastic" thing was a joke, but it really is that unclear. Like, it's nowhere near as wildly misleading as the "truth" "doubt" "lie" mechanic could be in L.A. Noire, but I don't feel like this "role-playing game" is actually allowing me to role-play in any real sense, because all the information I would need in order to be able to do it is hidden. During your side of the conversation, the camera inexplicably jumps out of first person perspective so that you can see the man-robot trying and failing to activate its expression module. It's a minor annoyance sitting like icing on top of a cake made of shit, but why on earth they decided to have the camera do that is beyond me.

They did it because it's what more story/character-driven RPG series, like Mass Effect, Dragon Age, and The Witcher, have been doing lately. But Bethesda wasn't willing to give you a main character with a developed personality and lengthy dialogue options like those games do, so they bizarrely tried to mash it together with their usual style of a freeform RPG with a blank slate for a main character. An attempt at having it both ways ended up having it neither way. Incidentally, if you use the mod that shows you your "real" dialogue options, it becomes laughable just how blatantly dishonest the whole system is:





If they wanted to switch gears and do something more about story or character, that would be fine, but this superficial, shallow disguise satisfies nobody. Yeah, a lot of people liked F4, but I'm sure that none of them were actually invested in the characters or found the inane story to be moving or compelling.

Quote
I definitely prefer the feel of combat in this game to Fallout 3, and obviously it is a better looking game, but this second attempt at a dramatic Heart-Wrenching Personal Story™ is even worse than the first. Maybe it gets better and more compelling the further you go, but I'm pretty confident that isn't the case.

It gets worse. It gets so, so much worse. You've really cheated yourself out of the full F4 experience by not following this idiotic story to its sappy conclusion.

1171
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: February 05, 2018, 04:13:04 AM »
What especially kills me about the Knightmare is the sheer fanboyism that was clearly driving it. It practically revels in its obscurity and inaccessibility to most viewers, making it a lousy teaser even in purely commercial terms. Like others have pointed out, if you aren't familiar enough with DC lore to understand what's going on, you're going to get absolutely nothing out of this scene, because of how vague, bizarre, and confusing it is. And it's so long and extravagant, too. How much time and money went into this scene? I understand that creating an action scene in a movie like this is always going to be expensive, but when you've got a scene that doesn't serve the narrative in any way and is clearly just the director spending millions of dollars smashing his action figures together...well, you'd think it might call for a bit more oversight from the people in charge.

1173
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: February 01, 2018, 03:13:11 PM »


What a ridiculous scene. What the hell were they thinking with this? It's almost like a short film just nestled within the rest of the movie.

1174
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Just Watched
« on: January 30, 2018, 04:57:35 AM »
Vulture's design was great, but I found the character to be far more intimidating and memorable when he was just Michael Keaton without the outfit. His interactions with Peter were a highlight of the movie, and perhaps the only time where the movie's general treatment of Spidey as a scrub who's in over his head felt truly justified.

1177
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Just Watched
« on: January 24, 2018, 09:34:34 PM »
capeshit capeshit I watch nothing but capeshit

Spider-Man: Homecoming (Jon Watts, 2017)

A fun Spidey movie, but not much else. In particular, I wasn't a fan of how continuity-heavy it was. Presumably they wanted to emphasize the MCU setting to differentiate this version of the character from Sony's previous efforts, but they lean into it so much that it becomes a gimmick. Hey, remember that character from this movie? Remember when that happened in this other movie? Recognize this gadget from that movie? And then they had to build Peter's arc around his ambition to impress Tony Stark and join the Avengers, ensuring that the above appealing-to-continuity moves out of subtext and becomes text. That is to say, we have the main character constantly asking us to remember the previous movies in the MCU while the film itself does the same thing.

Also, I think I understand what junker and Snupes were criticizing now - this movie really goes out of its way to smack Spidey around, portray him as incompetent, and have Tony deliver condescending lectures to him, all to emphasize that he's just not ready to play with the big boys. It's the movie's answer to a question that doesn't need to be asked. Peter wouldn't join the Avengers full-time because he's a fucking kid. He's not going to leave his friends, his family, and his home behind to go fight terrorists and aliens on the other side of the world for a living. This didn't need to be spelled out, and it absolutely didn't need an entire movie's worth of tomfoolery and ineptitude before he could finally prove that he wasn't a complete bumblefuck and turn down a spot on the Avengers on his own terms.

Thor: Ragnarok (Taika Waititi, 2017)

This was great. Wacky colors, synths, lovable characters, and big laughs all around. My one issue with it was how thoroughly Karl Urban was wasted. They couldn't come up with anything better for him to do than stand around looking conflicted, stand around looking conflicted, listen to exposition, and stand around looking conflicted some more?

1179
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: January 22, 2018, 11:11:44 PM »
Fired for what?

1180
That's how the banks were bailed out.

The banks were bailed out by the government buying their distressed securities. It had nothing to do with debt monetization.

Quote
That's how you ran up a $trillion debt on the F-35

This also had nothing to do with debt monetization. You're just pointing to examples of high spending from the government and blaming it on the Fed.

Pages: < Back  1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 78  Next >