Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Tumeni

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 116  Next >
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 14, 2021, 09:56:27 PM »
The Former Guy, looking "gaunt and pale" at Trump Tower, and still looking as though he's been sleeping in his suit....


Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 14, 2021, 08:45:57 AM »
Best Trump video of the day;



Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 13, 2021, 08:25:42 PM »
... it makes complete sense that radicalized Anti-Trump Democrats would leak classified information ...

Only the "radicalized" ones.

Are there also non-radicalised Anti-Trump Democrats, or does being radicalised go with the gig?

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 06, 2021, 10:51:37 PM »
I doubt that attacking or comparing looks will go well for you.

I doubt we'll see much difference in a before and after pic of Biden last year and this. Even if there is, Biden has never worn an orange ferret on his head.

The first ladies' looks are irrelevant when compared to each other. The comparison between last year and this year is OF THE SAME PERSON, not between two different folks. 

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 06, 2021, 10:03:36 PM »
This is such a weird sidebar. From the top, mocking Trump for losing weight is goofy. The man needed to lose some weight, he managed to do so, and he's definitely healthier now for it.

Sorry, but I don't think he looks healthier at all, at all. And I wasn't mocking him for losing weight, merely observing the fact that he had.

He doesn't look bad in that picture because he's "gaunt" (he's not); he looks bad because he's an awful dresser, has a shitty hairdo and nauseating fake tan, and is in general a very physically unattractive man. Basically, the same reasons he's looked bad all his life.

The bolded part is basically what I said. The loss of weight makes the ginger ferret up top look even weirder than it did before, and the suit trousers look as though he's been sleeping in them. 

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 04, 2021, 10:24:53 PM »
So he's still releasing regular statements per normal then, except on a different part of the website. Okay.  ::)

Yes, not on the blog. The blog was supposed to be where fans/sycophants got notified of new posts by signing up, where they could interact directly with the former guy, and home a host of other fun activities.

Now it's just a statement on a web page. You can see the difference, can't you?

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 04, 2021, 10:23:02 PM »
Compare and contrast

January 2020

June 2021

Let's gloss over the fact that the former guy looks as though he's been using his suit trousers for pyjamas, and focus on him looking much more gaunt than last year, making the orange ferret on his head look even more incongruous....

Is there any link between that FES and this one?

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: June 02, 2021, 08:32:07 PM »
The former guy's much-vaunted 'platform', set up as a replacement for his Twitter feed, has died, only 29 days after launch.

I didn't have a problem in my youth. I went directly to skilled office jobs ...

When was this?

Reading between the lines, Tom seems to be in a time-warp intersecting the 1950s and 1960s.

Temporal anomaly alert.

I can afford insurance just fine. It's not going to benefit me if the government increases taxes to support people to supplement the lives of twenty year-olds with temp jobs and people who failed in life with this new massive socialized healthcare system.

Does the phrase "I'm alright, Jack" have any resonance for you?

Further commentary with billing examples on the American Healthcare System/Business

If you think that you will be going in to the Dr. on a more minor and regular basis to where you would spend under 10K in medical costs a year then there are alternative plans available. If you are a McDonalds worker and don't want a catastrophic plan then you get something like a mini-med plan:

... or you could take a small contribution from each taxpayer, each year, spend a little less on other govt spending, and finance a medical system where the general public don't have to worry about whether or not an illness will bankrupt them, and can just go to the doctor or hospital for free.

As was said earlier, your healthcare system is so totally and utterly effed up....

...and, it's back to normal. False alarm, then. I closed the browser tab and reopened it. I'll screenshot if it happens again

Chrome on Win XP

I have similar doubts as to the true nature of the moon, including its eerie glow.  It does not reflect light the way a spherical reflector does/should, and may well be an ionization effect or some sort of reflection.

How should it reflect light, and how do you assert that would differ from what we all see at present?

Last post date in the sub-forum lists, the bolded titles in the stickied sub-fora ... switched from black text on white background to white text on white.

Not visible unless the text is selected, then shows up as white within blue selection area. 

Flat Earth Community / Re: i dont understand someone help please
« on: May 10, 2021, 06:12:59 PM »
The math will show they meet at some point bellow the observer.

It is indicative of nothing.

You have to define the point, or else you have no lat/long system. Cannot be a different point every time. Unless you can show us how?

To save you time, these mountain ranges should not be visible. The only explanation from the round earth perspective ...

Or you could focus on things which are clearly visible, which would remove the argument of whether or not they should be visible.

Extend the principles of Rowbottom's experiment 2, but observe objects which are farther than Rowbottom's, but still within clear view.

To save you time, this has been done already.

Flat Earth Community / Re: i dont understand someone help please
« on: May 10, 2021, 10:50:15 AM »
The fact that two lines originating from two points in the sky would first intersect at some point below the observer shows nothing.

If you agree that an angle in degrees is formed by two vectors or lines, and that two places are separated by a number of degrees of latitude or longitude, where is the point at which they intersect?

Can you show a diagram of how you see it working?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 116  Next >