*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #120 on: September 29, 2021, 09:03:47 AM »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #121 on: September 29, 2021, 02:23:23 PM »
Now the new model of the Universe is known in Russian Police.
https://police-russia.com/showthread.php?t=110296
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #122 on: September 29, 2021, 05:51:56 PM »
your links aren't working... 
Truth doesn't pick sides.

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #123 on: September 29, 2021, 07:17:16 PM »
your links aren't working...
I know. My topics were removed from all that sites.
Here is another empty link: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=54882.0

Screenshot compilation as a proof:
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline stack

  • *
  • Posts: 2391
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #124 on: September 29, 2021, 08:49:46 PM »
your links aren't working...
I know. My topics were removed from all that sites.

Why was it removed?

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #125 on: September 29, 2021, 09:24:07 PM »
your links aren't working...
I know. My topics were removed from all that sites.

Why was it removed?
The budget of the global space industry is enormous resources. About 80% of these resources are focused on space exploration. My model of the Universe is irrefutable proof of the futility (uselessness and pointlessness) of space exploration.

Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline stack

  • *
  • Posts: 2391
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #126 on: September 30, 2021, 03:14:52 AM »
your links aren't working...
I know. My topics were removed from all that sites.

Why was it removed?
The budget of the global space industry is enormous resources. About 80% of these resources are focused on space exploration. My model of the Universe is irrefutable proof of the futility (uselessness and pointlessness) of space exploration.

What makes it irrefutable?

Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

Which part of the sun's axial rotation are you referring to?


*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #127 on: September 30, 2021, 05:49:47 PM »
Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

Which part of the sun's axial rotation are you referring to?


Average, mean value of solar axial period! The Sun rotates on its axis once in about 27 days.
The Moon orbits the Earth once every 27.322 days. No way its coincidence. It is a pattern, regularity.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline stack

  • *
  • Posts: 2391
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #128 on: September 30, 2021, 06:30:41 PM »
Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

Which part of the sun's axial rotation are you referring to?


Average, mean value of solar axial period! The Sun rotates on its axis once in about 27 days.
The Moon orbits the Earth once every 27.322 days. No way its coincidence. It is a pattern, regularity.

Who said it was a coincidence?

So what makes your theory irrefutable?

Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #129 on: October 04, 2021, 04:56:17 AM »
Your Theory about the Sun and Moon 27 day Rotation and Orbit sounds similar to "Mutual Tidal Locking" we see with Pluto and its moon Charon:

"At half the size of Pluto, Charon is the largest of Pluto's moons and the largest known satellite relative to its parent body. Pluto-Charon is our solar system's only known double planetary system. The same surfaces of Charon and Pluto always face each other, a phenomenon called mutual tidal locking. Charon orbits Pluto every 6.4 Earth days."

 https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/pluto-moons/charon/in-depth/

Truth doesn't pick sides.

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #130 on: October 17, 2021, 01:02:49 PM »
Formation of continents.

Look closely at the animation of two huge, diametrically opposed formations on the surface of the Earth’s core (Earth Blobs). They cannot but be directly related to the formation of continents. They are both displaced in the same direction (east). From them to the east displaced continents. Compare with the official model of continent formation. These huge structures contradict the official model of continent formation.


Animation source link: The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs

The Cordillera — the Andes, the Iranian highlands — the Himalayas — are also two huge formations of a similar shape, also diametrically opposed to each other. Each of them are displaced east of their Earth Blobs. Cordillera — The Andes are displaced further from their Earth Blobs and are more split. Iranian Highlands — The Himalayas are closer to their Earth Blobs, and are displaced northward.



New model of the Universe.

From the above, we can conclude that before the moment of the so-called “Big Bang” in the Universe there was a certain material sphere with a diameter of about 20 thousand km, the substance in which was in the stage of the limit of density (the state of singularity). Let’s call this sphere ProtoEarth.



As a result of certain processes at the Proto-Earth’s poles two PreContinents were gradually formed — PreAmerica (North America, South America and Antarctica) and PreEurasia (Africa, Eurasia and Australia), in the centers of which the Sun and the Moon were gradually formed. Parallel to this, water was formed in a wide strip of the proto-Earth’s equator as a result of certain processes. At a certain moment, a critical mass difference accumulated at the poles, the equilibrium of the system was violated, the separation of the Sun and the Moon began, the proto-Earth’s axis of rotation shifted from conditional zero degrees to the current 23.5 degrees, and the formation of modern continents.


(a huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing)

A few more arguments in favor of this model of the Universe:
- The coincidence of the apparent diameters of the Sun and the Moon in the sky.
- The coincidence of the axial periods of rotation of the Sun and the Moon (27 days).
- Only Mercury and Venus have no satellites.
- Only Mercury and Venus have incommensurably large periods of rotation around their axes 58 and 243 days, respectively (Earth, Mars — 1 day; Jupiter, Saturn — 16, 17 hours; Uranus, Neptune — 9, 10 hours).
- In each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side.


(schematic comparison of the official and new model of the Universe; ProtoEarth, Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars and common center of masses between Earth and Sun)

Thus, it is very similar to the fact that the Universe looks approximately like on the Tycho Brahe’s model of the Universe, only with the correction for the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass. The Oort cloud is the border of the Universe, where all the “stars” and “galaxies” formed from the proto-Earth mantle, with diameters not exceeding several tens of kilometers, are located. The diameter of the universe, presumably, does not exceed one light minute.



In all this, a correct understanding of the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around a common center of mass is very important. The ratio of diameters is approximately the same as in the animation (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).



The nature of light and the size of the Universe.

A photon has energy and momentum (weight) but no mass. It is obvious that light is vibrations of some medium (ether). This environment cannot but have resistance, damping or absorbing light vibrations with time and distance. I will describe the essence in simple words so as not to complicate and not drag out the explanation.

1) Water waves.
They spread longer (in time) than sound, but at a shorter distance (at a lower speed). Distribution medium: water.

2) Sound waves.
The lifetime of sound waves is shorter than that of water waves, but the speed (and distance) is greater. Distribution medium: atmosphere (gas).

3) Light waves.
By analogy, the lifetime of light waves should be much shorter than the lifetime of sound waves, but since the speed of light is about 300,000 km/s — the propagation distance is greater. Distribution medium: ether.


(a schematic representation of a photon — a conventional unit of oscillation (wave) of the ether) Image text translation: The movement of one light wave (photon) from the source to complete attenuation and / or absorption by the medium (ether).

At the beginning of the 20th century, scientists rejected the completely plausible hypothesis of the Tired Light, began to carry out fortune-telling by redshifts of the spectrum (like on coffee grounds, only by the emission spectra), and billions of light years, black holes, dark energies, and distant, distant galaxies rushed.

Light years?

A photon cannot exist not only for years, but even for minutes. Example. Standing in the lake. You throw a stone. First you hear the sound, later the waves come. Waves on water, sound waves in a gaseous medium and light waves in ether are phenomena of the same nature, but of different orders due to the environment. If waves on water “live” for minutes, and sound waves in a gaseous medium “live” for seconds, then light waves in their medium (ether) “live” for a fraction of a second. All this depends on the power of the source of wave oscillations, so it can be assumed that light waves from the Sun can exist for several seconds, but not more (not minutes, and even less years).

Even if in the space environment (vacuum) there is no resistance, there is no heat exchange, then the distance is overcome (volume expansion with distance), which cannot occur absolutely without energy consumption. In addition, the space of the cosmic vacuum cannot be absolutely empty. There cannot but be certain, albeit minimal, resistance and heat transfer. Light years and 8 light minutes from Sun to Earth are physically impossible.

Again. Attentively. This is very important to understand. Overcoming distance in any environment, that is, regardless of the environment, cannot occur without energy consumption (or with zero energy consumption). Since a photon has a very low energy charge, and a very high speed of movement, and no medium (including space) can have absolutely zero resistance, then, accordingly, the lifetime (life) of one photon (wave oscillation of the medium — ether) is very short, not exceeding at least one minute.

Definition. The lifetime of a unit of wave oscillations (one wave) is inversely proportional to the speed of their propagation (or directly proportional to the inertia of the medium) and is directly proportional to the power of their source.

Since the ether is not scientifically recognized, it turns out that a photon is a conventional unit of wave oscillations of an incomprehensible medium? A photon has weight (energy and momentum), but no mass — it is obvious that this is an oscillation (wave) of some medium (ether).

Ordinary waves have a medium — water.
Sound waves have a medium — a gas (atmosphere).
Do light and radio waves have a medium? The ether has not yet been allegedly proven.

The aquatic environment is inhabited.
The gaseous environment (atmosphere) is inhabited.
Is the ether inhabited? Where do UFOs come from? Where do the “aliens” (angels / demons) live?


Sun and Moon traces on the Earth's surface.

Tectonic plates are formed under the pressure of a large mass, therefore they are also called continental plates. The Pacific plate is formed under the pressure of a homogeneous mass of water over a large area. The tectonic plates outlined in red rectangles (PHILIPPINE PLATE, COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE) in the image below were formed under the pressure of large masses that were once there, but now they are not there - under the pressure of the Sun and the Moon. In addition, the tectonic plates outlined in red rectangles in the image below completely repeat the outlines of traces on the Earth's surface.

The Sun flew farther from the Earth and left only one trace on the surface (PHILIPPINE PLATE). The Moon hooked the Earth several times while entering its current orbit along an elliptical trajectory - it left three tracks on the Earth's surface: COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE.



Japan - the land of the rising sun.
The name of the country “Mexico” and the city of Mexico City are believed to be derived from the words metztli (“Moon”) and xictli (“navel, middle”), thus meaning “middle of the Moon”.



Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

Real structure of the Universe.


(ProtoEarth, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars; common center of mass between Earth and Sun; distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km., distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.; Oort Cloud is the border of the Universe where all the “stars” and “galaxies” located; the diameter of the Universe does not exceed one light minute)

The rotation of the Earth and the Sun around a common center of mass (the Earth is larger).



Another small, but very interesting fact indirectly confirms my model of the Universe. On the American continents, there are armadillos in the wild, but no hedgehogs. In Africa and Eurasia, there are hedgehogs in the wild, but no armadillos.

Armadillos habitat and hedgehogs habitat.
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
The armadillos and the Moon have no thorns.

1) Self-organization
2) Fundamental aspects of the Universe.




Moon size calculation.

The trail from the Moon on the surface of the Earth.

The duration of an eclipse is directly proportional to the size of the object, all other things being equal (distance and speed). The duration of the total phase of a solar eclipse is 7.5 minutes (the Moon completely covers the Sun for 7.5 minutes). The duration of the total phase of the lunar eclipse is 108 minutes (the Earth completely covers the Sun for 108 minutes). With the same distance between the Moon and the Earth. At the same speed of the Moon (the orbit of the Moon moves with the speed of the Earth). The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km. Therefore, the diameter of the Moon can be calculated using the following formula: 12 742 * (7.5 / 108) = 885 km. The official diameter of the Moon is 3,474 km. Moreover, the result of calculating the diameter of the Moon quite accurately coincides with the size of the track between South America and Antarctica (875 km. + — 25 km.), which confirms the calculation and minimizes probability of a simple coincidence.

Factual (scientific) confirmation of the biblical Armageddon (End of the World).

And suddenly, after the sorrow of those days, the sun will darken, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of heaven will be shaken. (Gospel of Matthew 24:29)

Each next of the last five solar cycles is weaker than the previous one (one solar cycle lasts about 10 years). The fall in solar activity for 5 consecutive cycles, this is a regularity - a trend indicating the extinction of the Sun. The graphs of solar activity before 1950-1960 (before the beginning of the space era) cannot be reliable (the accuracy of observations was incomparably lower) - this is something like a forecast into the past.



The coronavirus pandemic is caused by solar activity. In 2009, there was a solar minimum and there was an epidemic (on the verge of a pandemic) of swine flu. In 2019, the solar minimum and the coronavirus pandemic began. At the same time, the ecology has significantly deteriorated over 10 years. And the current solar minimum is probably more extreme than the previous one.

I think over the course of several years the Universe will collapse to the limit of matter density into a sphere of a certain diameter ~ 20 thousand km. (all space objects will fly to the center of mass common between the Earth and the Sun along a spiral trajectory). The solar wind creates pressure from within the universe. The sun is dying out. When a certain critical minimum level of solar activity is reached, the process of folding the Universe into a "biblical scroll" will begin.



The stars in the sky will decay, and the sky will roll up like a scroll; the entire host of stars will fall like withered leaves from a vine, like dried fruit from a fig. (Isaiah 34: 4)

And suddenly, after the sorrow of those days, the sun will darken, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of heaven will be shaken. (Gospel of Matthew 24:29)
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #131 on: November 08, 2021, 04:31:25 AM »
Illusion. Dialectics. Truth.

Only recently (at the age of 36) I learned that dialectics is a branch of philosophy, not linguistics. Not knowing this concept, I came to the same conclusions. Brief essence of dialectics: "unity and struggle of opposites." Brief essence of my conclusions: “dynamic balance of opposites, + - at a specific moment / period of time, and strictly 50/50 at infinity in time”. This is the very essence, basis, foundation of the Universe, Nirvana, Nothingness, Non-existence. Absolute balance, when all opposites are strictly 50/50 balanced. When 10 units of good and 10 units of bad at the same time are neither good nor bad, this is nothing.

At first glance, it is paradoxical, but this Nothing is the basis of the Universe. All other religions and Worldviews are shells (superstructures) of this foundation. In Nirvana (in Absolute Nothing) there is no Buddha, there is no one and nothing at all, it is impossible to be there - this is an ideal concept (concept) - completely (100%) corresponding to reality. Other worldviews (religions) appear and collapse on the foundation of dialectics - these are illusory temporary and necessary shells. The better they are balanced (closer to reality 50/50) - the more bland and tasteless they are, the less attractive. The more attractive a religion or worldview is - the more unstable it is - the less it corresponds to reality, and the more disappointment it will bring to its followers after the epiphany or collapse of this worldview.

The percentage of reality of the three world religions according to my rough estimate (100% - full compliance with reality). Buddhism - 90%, Christianity - 50%, Islam - 20%.
The less the correspondence to reality, the more problems and contradictions are generated by religion or worldview. It is also interesting that Buddhism arose 2500 years ago, Christianity 2000 years ago, Islam 1500 years ago. A clear tendency to distort (damage) religions over time, distancing them from the foundation (basis) of reality.

Suffering purifies - goes to the asset of karma. The pleasures spoil - they go into the passive of karma. The price of pleasure (joy) is suffering (sadness) equivalent to the pleasure received. In this case, one must take into account the intensity and non-simultaneity (the scattering of suffering and pleasures over time). It is also important to understand that suffering (sorrow) and pleasure (joy) are physical and mental (mental), they are interconnected and interdependent - interdependent. It would probably be nice to have a visual actual balance of karma like a bank account, but most likely this is impossible, and you have to feel this balance intuitively, due to external circumstances and internal factors.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #132 on: November 08, 2021, 04:35:29 AM »
Is the Sun alive? Does It have consciousness?

Physically, the Sun is a material hot object, the diameter of which (according to my estimate) is about 2500-3000 km. The Sun and the Moon were formed from Proto-Earth, were at its poles in the centers of Pra-America (Moon) and Pra-Eurasia (Sun).

Is the Sun alive? Is It conscious? See for yourself. Two animations of the SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) satellite photos, which I named "The sun is yawning" (2016.07.13-20) and "The sun is sleeping" (2016.11.20-28). This happened on the Sun at the end of the 24th solar cycle, before the beginning of the solar minimum. And at first the Sun yawned, and then fell asleep.



The 25th solar cycle began and the Sun woke up (2021.11.06).
The face is contented, probably got enough sleep.



Complete irradiation of the Earth by solar flares. A clear cross.

On October 28, a powerful short-time flare occurred in the southern (lower) region of the Sun. On November 2, a powerful bright long-time flare occurred in the northern (upper) region of the Sun. The outbreak on October 28 occurred at about 6 pm. The outbreak on November 2 occurred at about 6 am. Both flares occurred exactly vertically opposite the Earth. Both (lower and upper) were at the same distance from the center of the sun. Periodicity of flares - 12 hours - precise irradiation of the western and eastern hemispheres of the Earth. Thus, these two flares irradiated four hemispheres: northern, southern, western and eastern - they irradiated the Earth in a cross.


Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk