*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11660 on: August 15, 2024, 04:30:16 PM »


Apparently, by Trump's own words, he shouldn't run.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11661 on: August 15, 2024, 07:20:28 PM »
Well shit ... YouTube did not like that video of Trump talking about Hillary.  Wonder why....


Also:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-allies-fear-sabotaging-campaign
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2988
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11662 on: September 10, 2024, 07:02:05 PM »
Here, the DOJ Chief of Public Affairs plainly states the "criminal" prosecutions of Trump are a JOKE:

To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11663 on: September 10, 2024, 11:58:48 PM »
I'll maybe watch the video later but...


Of course it's a joke.  Any other person would have been tried and sentenced by now with minimal media attention but not Trump.  He's making a spectical every time a normal legal process occurs.  Trump did a bad thing and now he's trying to be a clown in the court to keep people from thinking it's serious.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3483
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11664 on: September 11, 2024, 03:46:30 AM »
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/06/politics/manhattan-us-attorney-office-spokesperson-video-trump-hush-money/index.html

Here's what happened. Crowder sent an attractive woman to hit on this dude and say to him, "Oh, isn't it awful that they're trying to prosecute poor innocent Trump? You agree with me, right?" Blaise thought with his dick and promptly assured her that of course they're in full agreement on this subject, and of course Trump is entirely innocent. That's all this is. Blaise was not blowing the whistle or revealing secret information; he was trying to get laid.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2988
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11665 on: September 11, 2024, 05:52:35 AM »
I'll maybe watch the video later but...


Of course it's a joke.  Any other person would have been tried and sentenced by now with minimal media attention but not Trump.  He's making a spectical every time a normal legal process occurs.  Trump did a bad thing and now he's trying to be a clown in the court to keep people from thinking it's serious.
Funny. I believe you stated once, here on this forum, these cases would have never been brought if Trump was not running for President.

You have no legitimate opinion to offer.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2988
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11666 on: September 11, 2024, 05:54:26 AM »
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/06/politics/manhattan-us-attorney-office-spokesperson-video-trump-hush-money/index.html

Here's what happened. Crowder sent an attractive woman to hit on this dude and say to him, "Oh, isn't it awful that they're trying to prosecute poor innocent Trump? You agree with me, right?" Blaise thought with his dick and promptly assured her that of course they're in full agreement on this subject, and of course Trump is entirely innocent. That's all this is. Blaise was not blowing the whistle or revealing secret information; he was trying to get laid.
You, too, stated the cases would not have been prosecuted if Trump wasn't running for President.

You are dismissed.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3483
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11667 on: September 11, 2024, 01:28:33 PM »
No, I didn't. What a weird thing to say. ???
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11668 on: September 11, 2024, 03:00:43 PM »
I'll maybe watch the video later but...


Of course it's a joke.  Any other person would have been tried and sentenced by now with minimal media attention but not Trump.  He's making a spectical every time a normal legal process occurs.  Trump did a bad thing and now he's trying to be a clown in the court to keep people from thinking it's serious.
Funny. I believe you stated once, here on this forum, these cases would have never been brought if Trump was not running for President.

You have no legitimate opinion to offer.
Prove it.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2988
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11669 on: September 27, 2024, 07:27:53 PM »
Well, Trump is probably going to win the appeal on that idiotic civil claim verdict made by Engeron the perv.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11670 on: September 28, 2024, 10:23:29 AM »
Maybe.
But it's kept Trump distracted.  And angry.  Which means he rambles and doesn't put together policy.  Which was the plan all along.  You'd know this if you were a Democrat and got the monthly planning letters.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2988
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11671 on: September 28, 2024, 11:45:00 AM »
Maybe.
But it's kept Trump distracted.  And angry.  Which means he rambles and doesn't put together policy.  Which was the plan all along.  You'd know this if you were a Democrat and got the monthly planning letters.
Trump is a Democrat. DId he get the letters?
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11672 on: September 28, 2024, 07:06:50 PM »
Maybe.
But it's kept Trump distracted.  And angry.  Which means he rambles and doesn't put together policy.  Which was the plan all along.  You'd know this if you were a Democrat and got the monthly planning letters.
Trump is a Democrat. DId he get the letters?
Yeah but he never reads em.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11673 on: October 04, 2024, 02:36:58 PM »
Oh look, a school mandate to give Trump money.

https://x.com/Phil_Lewis_/status/1842197843781571027/photo/2
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline Tom Bishop

  • Zetetic Council Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10787
  • Flat Earth Believer
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11674 on: October 05, 2024, 11:20:38 PM »
A Bible that includes the US Pledge of Allegiance and the US Constitution is pretty much a 1950's-era conservative meme. This is likely why the Bible that Trump endorsed was created in the first place. Neither Trump or the Bible printing company originated the concept of merging US Constitution studies and Bible studies - that is an old 1950's Americana thing.

The claims that this requirement is anti-competitive are weak, even if Trump is the only person currently selling that Bible and gave schools the idea for the concept. None of it is copyrighted, and none of it is original. For it to be anti-competitive would have to play dumb and pretend that this is hard to obtain or create, or that no publishing companies have ever produced special prints for schools, which is false.

If someone who is eligible to make a bid wants to create that meme Bible, they can throw it together and order prints within a day with various online services. Any major publishing house has the resources to bid for the requirements easily. The God Bless the USA Bible that Trump endorsed is also $60. If someone can beat that price in a government bid, they get the contract.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2024, 11:40:25 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7847
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11675 on: October 05, 2024, 11:50:47 PM »
A Bible that includes the US Pledge of Allegiance and the US Constitution is pretty much a 1950's-era conservative meme. This is likely why the Bible that Trump endorsed was created in the first place. Neither Trump or the Bible printing company originated the concept of merging US Constitution studies and Bible studies - that is an old 1950's Americana thing.

The claims that this requirement is anti-competitive are weak, even if Trump is the only person currently selling that Bible and gave schools the idea for the concept. None of it is copyrighted, and none of it is original. For it to be anti-competitive would have to play dumb and pretend that this is hard to obtain or create, or that no publishing companies have ever produced special prints for schools, which is false.

If someone who is eligible to make a bid wants to create that meme Bible, they can throw it together and order prints within a day with various online services. Any major publishing house has the resources to bid for the requirements easily. The God Bless the USA Bible that Trump endorsed is also $60. If someone can beat that price in a government bid, they get the contract.

Except thats not how it works.
I've done the whole bidding process.

So first you get a list of approved suppliers from the state.  This is done annually or bi-annually and doesn't change much. 

The suppliers have pre-agreed upon prices for items.  This is a contract and can't be changed.

If no approved suppliers has the item you need on their lists, you are allowed to find one who does.  And lo and behold... They did.

A publisher can't simply go "we'll make you one to order" as that won't be on the list.

It's VERY possible that the mandate was made after the list was published and the publishing company Trump uses added his bible to the contract list.  Which makes it the default winner.  But I'd need to see timelines.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.