The statement makes perfect sense if you refrain from cherry picking quotes out of context: https://www.facebook.com/NBCNews/videos/1853876347965720/
No, no it really doesn't.
Not sure what cherry picking is being done.
Here's the relevant bit straight from Trump's buddies news site:
<blockquote>ABC’s JON KARL: I want to get back to James Comey’s testimony. You suggested he didn’t tell the truth in everything he said. He did say under oath that you told him to let the Flynn — you said you hoped you could let the Flynn investigation go.
TRUMP: I didn’t say that.
KARL: So he lied about that?
TRUMP: Well, I didn’t say that. I will tell you. I didn’t say that.
KARL: And did you ask you to pledge loyalty?
TRUMP: And there would be nothing wrong if I did say it read today but I did not say that.
KARL: And did he ask you for a pledge of loyalty from you?
TRUMP: No, he did not.
KARL: So he said those things under oath. Would you be willing to speak under oath and give your version of those events?
TRUMP: 100%. I hardly know the man. I’m not going to say I want you to pledge allegiance. What would do that? Who would ask a man to pledge allegiance under oath? Think of that. I hardly know the man. It doesn’t make sense. No, I didn’t say that, and I didn’t say the other.</blockquote>
The only context I can think of is he answers the question then goes back to rant about he original question, mixing "under oath" in there for some reason.
And look, at the end (of your link) he said he's not hinting about having recordings but we'll find out more soon.
So just like the evidence of Obama wiretapping him, he's got nothing.