look into the vertical michelson-morley experiments.You must understand that the MMX interferometer = the SGX interferometer, they are equivalent.
This much was proven by one of the greatest experts on the Sagnac experiment of the 20th century, E.J. Post.
E. J. Post, A joint description of the Michelson Morley and Sagnac experiments.
Proceedings of the International Conference Galileo Back in Italy II, Bologna 1999,
Andromeda, Bologna 2000, p. 62
E. J. Post is the only person to notice the substantial identity between the 1925 experiment and that of 1887:
"To avoid possible confusion, it may be remarked that the beam path in the more well-known Michelson-Morley interferometer, which was mounted on a turntable, does not enclose a finite surface area; therefore no fringe shift can be expected as a result of a uniform rotation of the latter".
E. J. Post, Reviews of Modern Physics. Vol. 39, n. 2, April 1967
What, then, did Michelson and Morley actually measure?
A. Michelson and E. Morley SIMPLY MEASURED THE CORIOLIS EFFECT OF THE ETHER DRIFT. Since they did not use a phase-conjugate mirror or a fiber optic equipment, the Coriolis force effects ("attractive" and "repulsive") upon the light offset each other.
The positive (slight deviations) from the null result are due to a residual surface enclosed by the multiple path beam (the Coriolis effect registered by a Sagnac interferometer). Dayton Miller also measured the Coriolis effect of the ether drift in his experiment (Mount Wilson, 1921-1924 and 1925-1926, and Cleveland, 1922-1924).
Dr. Patrick Cornille (Essays on the Formal Aspects of Electromagnetic Theory, pg. 141):
Dr. Patrick Cornille (Advanced Electromagnetism and Vacuum Physics, 2003, pg. 150-157) has provided a thorough examination of the fact that the Michelson-Morley interferometer is actually a Sagnac interferometer with zero area.
Here is your vertical SGX experiment:
The technology used in Doug Marrett's vertical Sagnac interferometer is the most advanced so far.
It uses a fiber-optic gyroscope (FOG).
http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Sagnac/SagnacEarth.htmlThe experiment detected the CORIOLIS EFFECT, just like Michelson and Gale did.
BUT NOT THE SAGNAC EFFECT.
The vertical MMX or SGX does not record the SAGNAC EFFECT AT ALL.
Two very different formulas.
Here is the Coriolis effect formula:
Δt = 4AΩ/c^2
It is a physical effect, and it is directly proportional to the area of the interferometer.
By contrast, the Sagnac effect formula is an electromagnetic effect, and is directly proportional to the velocity.
Here is the correct derivation of the Sagnac effect formula for an interferometer whose center of rotation does not coincide with its geometrical center:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2117351#msg2117351Therefore, all vertical MMX/SGX interferometer only measure the Coriolis effect, but not the Sagnac effect.
This means that the Earth does not move in a vertical direction at all.
Here is another experiment, performed by two of the greatest physicists in the world today:
The other question one might ask is at what level curvature is important--if it is circular motion which causes the Sagnac effect as Ashby claims, how much does the path have to deviate from a straight line to cause the effect? At Los Angeles the earth rotates about 27 meters during the nominal 70 millisecond transit time of the signal from satellite to receiver. The deviation of the 27 meter movement from the straight line chord distance is only 35 microns at its largest point. It certainly seems incredible that a 35 micron deviation from a straight line could induce a 27 meter change in the measured range.
As a final proof that it is movement of the receiver which is significant--not whether that movement is in a curved or straight line path--a test was run using the highly precise differential carrier phase solution. The reference site was stationary on the earth and assumed to properly apply the Sagnac effect. However, at the remote site the antenna was moved up and down 32 centimeters (at Los Angeles) over an eight second interval. The result of the height movement was that the remote receiver followed a straight line path with respect to the center of the earth.
The Sagnac effect was still applied at the remote receiver. The result was solved for position that simply moved up and down in height the 32 centimeters with rms residuals
which were unchanged (i.e. a few millimeters). If a straight line path did not need the Sagnac adjustment to the ranges the rms residuals should have increased to multiple meters. This shows again that it is any motion--not just circular motion which causes the Sagnac effect.
http://web.stcloudstate.edu/ruwang/ION58PROCEEDINGS.pdf(Conducting a Crucial Experiment of the Constancy of the Speed of Light Using GPS, R. Wang/R. Hatch)
The Universe has an edge; a direct proof using the DARK FLOW data:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1936995#msg1936995Therefore, your precious UAFE must have an elliptical orbit, and not a straight vertical path.
How does the UAFE accelerator know where the edge of the universe is located, thus having the capacity to modify its trajectory/eccentricity accordingly?
As for the seismic waves debate, again, here is the direct proof that these types of waves are possible only on a flat earth:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg956136#msg956136