If you were really interested in the shape of the earth measuring dish angles and the path of the sun would be something to easily carry out. A reluctance to do this must show you are not serious in your belief.
Stop being lazy and follow through with the experiment you proposed. I'm not going to contribute to this discussion for you.
I believe the Earth is round and satellites exist.
If you do not see the value of figuring out if all those dishes spread across a continent are pointing at the same thing I can only think to tell you this:
1. You will be able to tell if they are pointing at the same thing
2. You can get an estimate of the altitude of the signal source.
3. If will be evidence for or against the existence of satellites.
4. It will help you determine the feasibility of using troposcatter. If it is being used it will need to be transmitting signals at multiple locations in a pattern that would emulate what is expected for a geosynchronous satellite. That is if those dishes are all pointing towards the same thing.
I still wonder why no FE does this.
You can also take advantage of the doppler effect in your quest for the truth. You will be able to determine the trajectory of the thing sending the signal.
You can get some open source programs for a lot of GPS devices. You will be able to review the calculations being used and install it on your device to see if it works properly. Since the calculations involve knowing the satellites' locations. If the wrong position is transmitted the calculations will give you the wrong fix.
You can observe the ISS over a period of time. You can estimate it's speed and altitude using a couple of different methods. See if it matches with what Kepler's laws say it should be.
You dismissed these ideas for observations before because you claimed none would determine the shape of the Earth. The topic now is about the existence of satellites. The above are some other things can be done to gather evidence about their existence and where they are.
You can make claims all you want, until you can offer evidence all you have is just saying something is true.
I also do not have to do the experiments, because I have observed the ISS through binoculars and telescope. I have an understanding of orbital mechanics and my observations match what I know about the subject.
Others have tracked satellites using the Doppler effect to determine their orbits. I have seen the results and it done while I lived in Florida. I have no reason to question the results or the conclusions.
Then there is the multitude of pictures taken by satellites and used daily by professionals in their careers across the globe.
The existence of these things orbiting the Earth is a huge hole in the FE hypothesis. It should really be towards the top of the list of things FE's need to look into.
Are they really up there?
If so, how high? What causes the different orbits?
If not, what are those stationary lights in the night sky that starting appearing around the 1970's?
What is causing the Irdium flares and why are they so predictable? How about the predictability of the other lights moving through the night sky?