The 'missing tracks' argument is absurd. In every photo you can see other rover tracks around the location of the rover. And,
we know from video evidence that NASA built a mobile, functioning rover. So apparently NASA built both a mobile and immobile rover, drove the mobile rover around, then lifted it up and removed it to set the immobile rover down at or around the original location of the mobile rover; or, they drove the mobile rover just a few feet from where they wanted to park it, got out, lifted the rover with a crane, and then set the rover down just a few feet from where it had been parked.
That completely defies logic. It just doesn't make any sense.
Notice how the dark rover tracks merge with the darker soil where the astronauts have been walking all around the rover, as if the soil was disturbed by boots and rover tracks. Notice that there are partial tread marks in the soil leading up to the rover, as if the soil was disturbed by boots. Notice that you can clearly see a cable that has been partially buried (bottom-left, and center-right) in the soil, as if the soil was disturbed by boots.