Can you post this on a separate thread, it's not relevant to what I asked.
fuck off then. Waste my fucking time.
I can see the love and compassion that your religion has instilled in you. It's heart warming to feel it.
Because you never bothered to read the post, follow the links and find out what Deism is. Deism - A force of nature created the universe and it doesn't give a shit about you.
You had a very comprehensive answer. You could have asked anything from it. You lost the opportunity. You have the theory, you can't even be bothered to read it to critique it.
You are right, I did just skim though it, apologies. I mostly saw some stuff about religion and a rant about atheism. I didn't think it was relevant. I see there was a little bit about stars. Something about them being on movers.
I still don't see how this answers the problem.
The centre of rotation of the circumpolar stars is always either due North or due South. The angle of elevation of their centres of rotation changes as you move from North to South. When you are at the North pole the centre of rotation of the Northern circumpolar stars is overhead, at the equator it has dropped to the horizon. The centre of rotation of the Southern circumpolar stars is directly overhead at the South pole and drops to the horizon at the equator. There is a symmetry.
If there were two sets of stars on two different movers above a flat Earth then sure one set could have a centre of rotation above the North pole. However, the centre of rotation of the other set would be at a particular point on the rim of the disc. It wouldn't be due South at any point on the Earth. You would have to give me some idea how high above the Earth they are in order for me to assess at what angle of elevation the centres of rotation would be at different locations. I also need to know what the distance from the North pole to the ice rim is on your model.
I think that's what your post was trying to say anyway. If I am wrong perhaps you can clarify.