1
Flat Earth Community / Re: Damning evidence against the heliocentric model...
« on: January 16, 2018, 12:13:24 AM »
Lack of CGI is not damning evidence. Your entire basis is factually incorrect.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
would be the lack of a CGI rendering of the complete model, along with a detailed release of all inputs used for creating the model.
Those inputs used for creating the model would need to minimally include Kepler's Laws of planetary motion and Newton's Laws of motion and universal gravitation and account for the Laws of Thermodynamics.
Does anyone have such a model, open for inspection?
So, if this axiom is sometimes true, is it also scientifically 'sometimes true' that the earth is round?
At least you validate that this axiom is sometimes true. Little victories!
Those axioms do not apply in all situations.
Arithmetic only works in a situation where those axioms are true. There are many models and situations where those axioms do not apply.
Yep, hence my original statement included the words, "becoming fewer and fewer," in reference to the amount of errors.
Please take a remedial reading course in terms of comprehension.
Better luck?If you look at what you said:Unless you can provide some documentary evidence of that, I am going to insist that it is totally fabricated rubbish!Yes, your claim was, "Any map presented to any explorer south of the Equator has errors to this day".Quote from: totallackeyAny map presented to any explorer south of the Equator has errors to this day (becoming fewer and fewer) and that explorer will soon find themselves off-heading, sometimes up to several hours of travel time.Unless you can provide some documentary evidence of that, I am going to insist that it is totally fabricated rubbish!
You have given one chart with possible errors of 200-300 m.
The video title claims that the GPS doesn't work, but the GPS did work and gave differences with the chart of 200-300 m.
Unless you show some independent evidence there is no way of knowing whether the error is in the GPS or the chart.
My guess is that the GPS was accurate and charts for South Georgia were not up to date.
Especially as the navigator says, "We have to round up this corner because the map is wrong. It's a little more like this."
So, you are complaining about a 200-300 m error in a remote location, when you don't even have an official flat earth map! What a joke!
In any case, it's a far cry from "Any map presented to any explorer south of the Equator has errors to this day" so you have not made a case especially when you go on to say "that explorer will soon find themselves off-heading, sometimes up to several hours of travel time".
So try again, better luck next time.
You asked for documentary evidence.
I provided documentary evidence; specifically, the Mighty Ships documentary.
And if you pay attention, the charts are also suspect.
So, get bent.
Flat Earthers have yet to show how hiding the shape of Earth provides the government/NASA/Illuminati with any money and/or power.
I believe the idea is that by only pretending to go to space, large amounts of money can be funneled into space pursuits, and then a fraction can be used to fake it and the rest goes into the pockets of the people on top.
So, in a real world problem an example has been found where 2+2 =/= 4.
I think everyone here owes Tom an apology.