Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Round fact

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10  Next >
1
Truth has taken Robert Heinlein's book The Number of the Beast and expanded it the point of an absurd fantasy.

2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 12, 2016, 05:35:45 PM »
The United States was founded by the brightest people in the country,
and we haven't seen them since.

Gore Vidal


The rules committee meets on Wednesday and on Thursday: they may have the votes to add new rules.


Since Trump wants good relationships with Russia, to print one's own money (in effect, getting rid of the Fed), to make America great again, let us take a look at the possible scenarios.

1. Romney/Ryan ticket (convention takeover) - from the point of view of secret societies, a Romney nomination is as good as a Cruz nomination.

2. Trump falls victim to a false flag assassination attempt (he is allowed to live, the public never hears from him again) - least likely.

3. Trump defeats Hillary, and then has to face countrywide riots/revolution, a civil war (especially if Deutsche Bank is allowed to implode).

4. Trump joins Sanders to face both Hillary and Romney.

Romney, no matter who his running mate is cannot win. He's too weak and ball-less

Trump sitting back in hiding?  Better chance of HRC telling the truth under oath in from of God.

Civil war, for winning? remember the left hates guns. One lefty wuss reporter shot an AR-15 in 223/5.56 NATO and almost had to be hospitalized for mental and physical trauma. So what are they going to fight with, spitballs? What would happen is the Flyover States, those producing the food, would just sit back and let the left starve and freeze to death. 

Trump/Sanders. Put the crack pipe down. A 110% Capitalist and 1000% Marxist on the same ticket. Yeah right. Sure thing.

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 12, 2016, 12:11:40 PM »
The claim is that Hillary is influenced by corrupt Jewish money, as seen here. Given how much trouble David Duke was for Trump's campaign in the news cycle last time, you'd think he'd want to steer clear of anything associated with him this time.

Who attacked you?


NOPE not even close. Saudi money yes, and proven.

But keep trying, this is fun to watch

I was not commenting on the veracity of the claim, dummy. I was saying that it exists, and is the mindset from which the antisemitic Hillary picture came from.

It exists because that is all the left has. Playing the race card is the last refuge of bankrupt mind. IE 99.99% of the left

Ok seriously, all this ad hominim is annoying.  You're being an ass so stop it.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 11, 2016, 10:32:29 PM »
The claim is that Hillary is influenced by corrupt Jewish money, as seen here. Given how much trouble David Duke was for Trump's campaign in the news cycle last time, you'd think he'd want to steer clear of anything associated with him this time.

NOPE not even close. Saudi money yes, and proven.

But keep trying, this is fun to watch

I was not commenting on the veracity of the claim, dummy. I was saying that it exists, and is the mindset from which the antisemitic Hillary picture came from.

It exists because that is all the left has. Playing the race card is the last refuge of bankrupt mind. IE 99.99% of the left

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 11, 2016, 09:13:17 PM »
Hillary Clinton is NOT Jewish. Never claimed she is and as far as I know, no one else is saying she is. So, anyone making the claim that the image used is referring to Jews, now needs to connect the dots showing that a Jewish symbol with her picture, a person NOT Jewish is in fact anti-semitic.

Good look with that mental gymnastics.


The claim is that Hillary is influenced by corrupt Jewish money, as seen here. Given how much trouble David Duke was for Trump's campaign in the news cycle last time, you'd think he'd want to steer clear of anything associated with him this time.

NOPE not even close. Saudi money yes, and proven.

But keep trying, this is fun to watch

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 11, 2016, 04:51:33 PM »
Lord Dave. I always vote. IF I don't then I have right to complain about the crap congress and POTUS does.

Voting is just a method for the establishment to shift the blame for our shitty circumstances to the general public, when it's pretty damn obvious to me that we are constantly sold down the river by politicians on both sides of the isle.

At least with tyrants we had someone to hate, now they want to say "You see what you did?!? You should've voted for John Jackson instead of Jack Johnson, you fucked everything up!"

????????????????????????

What didn't you understand? The kings and queens of old realized to stop the people from chopping their heads off they had better create this shell entity called democracy where you pretend to give the people a say in the things that affect their lives.

Was a simple way to shift blame from themselves yet still retain control. If you think the world has evolved past that kind of power structure imagine how many major western countries are still commonwealth countries with allegiance to the Queen of England.


Ah, I see the problem. You think the US is a democracy.  News flash it is not, nor has it ever been. What the US IS, is  a Constitutional REPUBLIC.  With one major constitutional flaw, that could be fixed with one simple amendment. Term limits.

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 11, 2016, 03:55:07 PM »
Lord Dave. I always vote. IF I don't then I have right to complain about the crap congress and POTUS does.

Voting is just a method for the establishment to shift the blame for our shitty circumstances to the general public, when it's pretty damn obvious to me that we are constantly sold down the river by politicians on both sides of the isle.

At least with tyrants we had someone to hate, now they want to say "You see what you did?!? You should've voted for John Jackson instead of Jack Johnson, you fucked everything up!"

????????????????????????

8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 11, 2016, 03:54:02 PM »
that two symbols can have identical shapes and different meanings is such a ubiquitous phenomenon that it has its own name.  pretending to be unaware of this doesn't make one's argument better, only worse and more confusing.

This is only relevant if the shapes do have different meanings, which is clearly not what Rushy is arguing. Bad bait.

indeed.  i am saying that the shapes do have different meanings.  meaning is always contextual.  as i see it, you and rushy are arguing a reductio ad absurdum: the view that the hillary meme is anti-semetic necessarily leads to the absurd conclusion that the cover of frozen must also be anti-semetic.  the problem is that not one person is claiming that any use of a six-sided star is anti-semetic.

in other words, we're saying that it's reasonable for someone to believe that this particular use of these symbols, in this particular context (esp. its origin), reeks of long-standing and well-understood anti-semetic stereotypes and conspiracies.

"but someone else used one of these symbols in a completely different context for a completely different purpose!" doesn't actually address the criticism of this use of these symbols in this context.

It's pretty funny how deeply you can get leftists to think about anti-semitic stereotypes in order to craft a conspiracy theory like this. The point here is that if Disney were implicated in anti-semitic activity, I'm sure you could craft a similar narrative for Frozen as well. And if you can't - well, maybe you're not using your imagination well enough. But up until that happens, there's plenty reason to believe that you're only willing to apply a ridiculous amount of conjecture to one thing but not the other.

the hillary image isn't anti-semetic because what if under different circumstances i made a bad argument suggesting that the cover of frozen is anti-semetic?  what?

so this image can't be anti-semetic because you believe i would make different arguments about different things under different circumstances...i dunno how to respond to that...

Hillary Clinton is NOT Jewish. Never claimed she is and as far as I know, no one else is saying she is. So, anyone making the claim that the image used is referring to Jews, now needs to connect the dots showing that a Jewish symbol with her picture, a person NOT Jewish is in fact anti-semitic.

Good look with that mental gymnastics.

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 11, 2016, 09:38:25 AM »
Lord Dave. I always vote. IF I don't then I have right to complain about the crap congress and POTUS does.
I never said you didn't.

Just saying "good job for voting these people in.  Hows it working for ya?"

Well I didn't vote for Obama, and I will NOT vote for Clinton. So for now, at least for POTUS my vote hasn't done much. For the House, my vote has worked. For Senate it is 50/50 and looks to remain so.

The issue of the subject of this thread, is just so much left wing bull shit deflection, in order to avoid the clear violations of the laws and regulations of Clinton's handling of classified materials and documents. And the fact that the DOJ, via the FBI is NOT doing its job by not prosecuting her. Or at the very least revoking her clearance.

The Star is just a star. Those that are doing mental gymnastics to see anti-semitic messages, are the ones that are anti-semitic, by assuming the star and money are greedy Jews. They see it, because they buy into it. They see it, because the race card is all they have in  their arsenal against Trump. They see it, because the race card is the last refuge of a bankrupt mind.

10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 10, 2016, 08:24:27 PM »
I'm not excusing anyone's corruption; I'm just disappointed by such selective enforcement of the law for the sake of a partisan agenda.  I'd be delighted if this was the beginning of a new era of zero tolerance and cracking down on all misbehavior from politicians, Republicans and Democrats alike, but it's not, and that overshadows the whole thing for me.

Who are these politicians that are currently getting overlooked by law enforcement?

Clinton, Kennedy, Jackson, and the tax evader, who's name I cannot seem to recall at the moment. Just of starters.

11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 10, 2016, 02:44:55 PM »
Lord Dave. I always vote. IF I don't then I have right to complain about the crap congress and POTUS does.

12
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 10, 2016, 10:57:43 AM »
Can you provide some additional context to this? A quick search on google and Snopes didn't yield anything for me, but maybe I'm not using the right search words.

The link was in the post I quoted, albeit broken, and I fixed it in my post.  Here it is, just to be clear:

http://www.snopes.com/clinton-byrd-photo-klan]

Regarding the email issue, it is genuinely shitty.  However, I do feel that the issue is receiving something of a, how best to put it, disproportionate response from the Republicans in Congress who are apparently trying to make this out to be the worst political scandal in American history.  Hillary did something stupid, and then she tried to cover it up in a stupid way.  That's certainly not something I want our leaders to be doing.  But it pales in comparison to some of the shit that politicians and/or the government in general have done in recent years and continue to do today.  I don't see this huge, months-spanning investigation being a priority for any other reason other than political ones - that is to say, trying to sink Hillary's presidential campaign, something that I find very frustrating.  To put it another way, corrupt politicians should be investigated and brought down for the sake of justice, not so their equally-corrupt rivals can benefit from their absence.

Nixon was going to be impeached, WITH the GOP backing impeachment, for far less than what hillary did, and with the protection of the Dem party. Sad.

but then the Dems covered for her husband too. "A blow job is not sex" sure thing. Right.

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 08, 2016, 08:53:53 PM »

Are you seriously saying Clinton is not corrupt?

No, I have actually said she is incredibly corrupt.  Why?

Because it appears as though you support her.

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 08, 2016, 08:51:50 PM »
So in your view the flag of Israel is anti-semitic, because it has the Star of David on it. All Sherif and Police Departments with with 6 sided star are also anti-semitic. Never mind that Trump's grand kids are Jewish.

No, why would you say that?

Quote
You sir ARE the problem. You see hate where none exists, except for the hate YOU feel toward someone you disagree with.

I'm not surprised.

You're right.  Calling someone the most "corrupt candidate ever" is an act of love and acceptance. I don't hate Trump, I think he is a terrible candidate for president.  Stop being so dramatic.
[/quote]

Are you seriously saying Clinton is not corrupt?



15
Only if the bad guys KNOW that people in crowd WILL shot back. Even better would be if the media and police and DC made heroes out those that fought back

You think the guys shooting police didn't think the police would shoot back?

What kind of stupid question is that? No Shit Sherlock. Yep the police are known to shoot back. But police are in nice easy to see uniforms while the people  with the CCW and permission to open fire are NOT.

Would YOU shoot at cops if you knew a thousand people NOT in uniform ARE GOING to shoot back?

I wouldn't shoot at cops whether I had a good chance of surviving or not.  These guys would.  I think they probably knew they weren't going to get away with it, but did it for The CauseTM.

Quote
You know, that thing between your ears? It is not there just to hold your ear apart and to keep you eyes from rolling down to your toes. USE it once in a while.

Wow, that's inappropriate!

Then make the cost of "The cause" too freaking high.

Here is what I don't understand. the FBI UCR  has two glaring facts that the media avoid reporting. A cop kills a Black, on average, once in 28 HOURS. But Blacks kill other Blacks on average of one every 65 minutes.

Black lives matter ONLY and IF it is NOT a Black person doing the killing. Where is the demand for the heads of Black gang leaders? Where are the witnesses  when the gangs committee murder?

IF the Black community would be as active with videos etc with Black on Black crimes as they are with cops. Cities would be safe 24/7.

16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: July 08, 2016, 08:34:44 PM »
Or, you know, maybe it's just a star.

Hey, if you think that is the case, go to.  In this case, I have a really hard time believing that this image, taken from a board frequented by white supremacists and neo-nazis no less, was not scrutinized for its context and implications and that his campaign was not comfortable with all of those implications.

So in your view the flag of Israel is anti-semitic, because it has the Star of David on it. All Sherif and Police Departments with with 6 sided star are also anti-semitic. Never mind that Trump's grand kids are Jewish.

You sir ARE the problem. You see hate where none exists, except for the hate YOU feel toward someone you disagree with.

I'm not surprised.

17
Only if the bad guys KNOW that people in crowd WILL shot back. Even better would be if the media and police and DC made heroes out those that fought back

You think the guys shooting police didn't think the police would shoot back?

What kind of stupid question is that? No Shit Sherlock. Yep the police are known to shoot back. But police are in nice easy to see uniforms while the people  with the CCW and permission to open fire are NOT.

Would YOU shoot at cops if you knew a thousand people NOT in uniform ARE GOING to shoot back?

You know, that thing between your ears? It is not there just to hold your ear apart and to keep you eyes from rolling down to your toes. USE it once in a while.

18
As demonstrated in Dallas yesterday.

Only if the bad guys KNOW that people in crowd WILL shot back. Even better would be if the media and police and DC made heroes out those that fought back

19
Before a few days, Nasa gave up to join some meetings in Istanbul by the reason of terrorism. After a few days ISIS bombs effected and killed about 50 human in Istanbul.

Which NASA? That NASA i blame them directly supporting the terrorism like ISIS, al qaida, Boko Haram, etc.

NASA incomes about 20 billion dollars per year and about 19,9 billion dollars are dirty money and just about 100 million dollars are actual costs.

You should to understand why am i fighting the "evil / nasa" because these damn liar supporting terrorism.

Turkish intelligence service don't know the terrorist attack will be but NASA knows it. Because NASA gave the instruction to ISIS.

Our dictator Mister Erdoghan that supported strongly by Obama Regime, apologized to Russia and started a peace initiative with Russia. But USA that the father of the terrorism don't like this  initiative  and  launched the terror card. I hope Obama dies.

Palm plant to the face.

Just how many medications are you on anyway?

20
I'm pretty sure most of America's ghetto's are riddled with bullets already.
Yes but criminals with guns.
Imagine if it wasn't just the criminals with guns?

I'd be interesting to see what happens if literally everyone in the ghetto had guns instead of just the gangs. We'll call it: The War for Chicago. The Battle of Detroit. The Flint Massacre.

No, it would literally make them the safest place on Earth.

It might. They already have the worst murder rates in the country, might as well start dicking around to see if this changes things.
Well... if most of the people died, that would make it pretty damn safe afterwards, right?

An armed society is a polite society.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10  Next >