If the rag-tag group of underdogs called "Flat Earth Truthers" haven't managed to create a great Flat Earth map YET -- maybe they have families, day jobs, and other obligations, and can't dedicate their whole life to this hobby -- that isn't a dealbreaker.
Which is fair, but the fact that every proposed map has errors in the known sizes and shapes of land masses and distances between places should give you pause.
Most of the rest of your post is you simply not understanding basic physics. To go through it quickly:
What IS certain and a complete dealbreaker for the mainstream paradigm (globe earth, moving earth) is NASA being caught in lies hundreds of times.
Can you give an example of this?
And being able to see WAY TO FAR for a globe earth to be our reality.
Can you give an example of this? As I said in another thread, the examples I've seen are people doing their maths wrong, not accounting for refraction properly or simply misidentifying distant landmarks.
Also, water seeks its own level. Water doesn't ever bulge anywhere, on a macro OR micro scale. It is always flat and level.
Demonstrably not true on the micro scale - see water drops. On the macro scale, if that's true then why do ships disappear bottom first below the horizon as they go out to sea? What are they going behind?
Spinning balls tend to SHAKE OFF water, not hold it fast.
This is you not understanding angular velocity. If there's a ball with a thin film of water on it try rotating it at an angular speed of one rotation per 24 hours, see how much water shakes off.
And how can "gravity" keep a death grip on millions of tons of water on the bottom of the globe, yet it will let a helium ballon "go", no problem.
It's
because there are millions of tons of water. The force of gravity is proportional to mass. A helium balloon has a very low mass, and the helium is less dense than air makes it buoyant. Same principle with hot air balloons, they only rise when the air inside is heated such that the density is low enough to make it bouyant.
Why does gravity SOMETIMES hold things fast like a death grip, and other times cause things to orbit it? It seems to me, you can't have it both ways.
You can if you understand about forces balancing. An orbiting satellite is subject to gravity but it's also going fast enough horizontally that as it "falls" the earth curves away from it. If you get the speed right it will stay at the same altitude relative to the ground. And because it's in a vacuum there's no air-resistance to slow it down so it just keeps going round. Although that isn't strictly 100% true, space isn't a perfect vacuum so over time it does slow a little which is why satellites do end up falling back to earth, or they have to be occasionally boosted to account for this.
Those are some of the most convincing arguments for FE I can think of right now -- but there are others.
Sorry dude, but none of those are arguments for FE, they're simply you not understanding physics