*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4264
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1120 on: October 19, 2024, 01:39:01 PM »
Everything you write is pretty accurate, but you just don't quite get across how boring it was. I was actually kind of excited to see exactly how they were going to make this a musical and how Lady Gaga would end up fitting into that. Having the main characters occasionally stop all the momentum (such as there is, given the threadbare plot) to mumble their way through a dusty old standard was not what I was hoping to see. And it just made an already slow movie drag even more.

Say what you will about the first movie (it has a self-important air that it doesn't really earn, it wears its influences on its sleeve), I think it's rarely boring.

And yeah, the courtroom scenes were absolutely ridiculous. After how grounded these movies are in general having the judge allow Arthur to traipse around the courtroom like the southern bird lawyer in Futurama and do nothing but bully a witness took me all the way out of it.

And no, there's nothing on the screen to justify its ridiculous budget, nothing at all. As I said before even Gaga is just wasted. There's basically one big action set piece. 90% of the rest of the movie is the same prison interiors, the same courtroom. They deserve for this to be the bomb that it is. They had no business spending so much on a movie that looks so dull.

And, ok, I hated the ending, and part of what rankled me about it is that Todd Phillips changed the narrative to make a point to the toxic incels that revered Arthur in the first movie. There was never meant to be a Joker 2. The first movie was supposed to stand on its own and it definitely implied that Arthur would become the Joker. He changed the story as a "Take that" to the fans that made the first movie a hit. But couldn't he have gotten his point across without changing the intended story? How am I, who came into these movies as a fan of the character first and foremost, supposed to react to the fact that this was never the character I came to see, and that the only reason for this is that Phillips felt he needed to make a political point?

Sorry, WB, swing and a miss.
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8911
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1121 on: October 19, 2024, 04:21:48 PM »
I haven't seen the movie, so I'm not going to "review" it, but it sounds like a hit piece. The culmination of the movie industry's hatred of the "alt-right". The movie was created as an inverse to "you get what you deserve" and clearly planned to embarrass the audience. It sounds like it's supposed to make you mad/sad that you even bothered watching it.

The Boys is also of a similar tone, though somehow much of the audience didn't notice this until the 4th season. It's also probably not a coincidence that both of them include rape scenes of a male lead.

He took a risk and made the movie he wanted to make rather than take the safe route.

In my opinion, what he did was taking the safe route for his career. Producing a movie that could be enjoyed by the "wrong" political groups is probably more damaging to his career than a film that would, on paper, lose a lot of money. The movie industry's motivations of networking and nepotism transcends a simple "make lots of money" modus operandi.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3539
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1122 on: October 19, 2024, 08:27:22 PM »
There's nothing alt-right or inherently politically conservative about this Joker or these movies. If you'll remember, the big controversy before the first one came out was that the character would turn into an incel hero and provoke similar violence - and I do still strongly suspect that the movie made a last-minute swerve and cut a scene of Arthur murdering Sophie to avoid that implication. For a sequel, with Joker being in a relationship with Harley, there'd be no fear of incels claiming him as one of their own, and there'd be nothing all that controversial about just another anti-hero-led crime movie. And if there were a political agenda behind this movie, I doubt that the people responsible would also want to drag Harley, a beloved character whose popularity has exploded in recent years and has become a feminist capeshit icon to her fans, down with Joker with this two-faced, sexist portrayal of her. This is by no means a politically progressive movie.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Shane

  • *
  • Posts: 3046
  • If you will it, it is no dream
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1123 on: October 20, 2024, 11:19:16 PM »
not a movie but capeshit: the penguin is pretty good. 
Quote from: Rushy
How do you know you weren't literally given metaphorical wings?

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8911
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1124 on: October 20, 2024, 11:45:18 PM »
There's nothing alt-right or inherently politically conservative about this Joker or these movies. If you'll remember, the big controversy before the first one came out was that the character would turn into an incel hero and provoke similar violence - and I do still strongly suspect that the movie made a last-minute swerve and cut a scene of Arthur murdering Sophie to avoid that implication. For a sequel, with Joker being in a relationship with Harley, there'd be no fear of incels claiming him as one of their own, and there'd be nothing all that controversial about just another anti-hero-led crime movie. And if there were a political agenda behind this movie, I doubt that the people responsible would also want to drag Harley, a beloved character whose popularity has exploded in recent years and has become a feminist capeshit icon to her fans, down with Joker with this two-faced, sexist portrayal of her. This is by no means a politically progressive movie.

The movie doesn't have to contain overt political themes in order to be politically motivated. Memes and themes of the original Joker movie were lauded on social media by an audience that the movie industry actively disdains. The sequel is the director's apology for accidentally pleasing the wrong crowd.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3539
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1125 on: October 21, 2024, 06:42:58 AM »
The politics of the people celebrating Joker may well have played a role in Phillips's decision to make this movie, but to extend that sentiment towards Hollywood as a whole, as if this was meant to somehow appease them, is a big stretch. I'll be the first to argue that the film industry has plenty of agendas and biases that get in the way of the supposed bottom line, but blowing close to two hundred million dollars on turbofucking a billion-dollar franchise, just because they didn't like how a bunch of alt-right types embraced the first movie? That's very far-fetched. Besides, if they regretted making Joker, why would they celebrate the movie months later by nominating it for a bunch of Oscars and letting it win two? It's their awards show, and they can award or snub any movie they like.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2024, 04:36:02 PM by honk »
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8911
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1126 on: October 21, 2024, 12:52:14 PM »
The politics of the people celebrating Joker may well have played a role in Phillips's decision to make this movie, but to extend that sentiment towards Hollywood as a whole, as if this was meant to somehow appease them, is a big stretch. I'll be the first to argue that the film industry has plenty of agendas and biases that get in the way of the supposed bottom line, but blowing close to two hundred million dollars on turbofucking a billion-dollar franchise, just because they didn't how a bunch of alt-right types embraced the first movie? That's very far-fetched. Besides, if they regretted making Joker, why would they celebrate the movie months later by nominating it for a bunch of Oscars and letting it win two? It's their awards show, and they can award or snub any movie they like.

I don't think a few months was enough time for the effects of the movie's audience to reach the right ears. I also highly doubt the movie actually cost anyone two hundred million dollars or did in fact lose money at all, but that's beside the point.

It probably wasn't intentional to make the movie as bad as it sounds. However, I do still believe it was fully intentional to release what's effectively a self-destruct mechanism on this IP. It also ensures you can quite easily mock anyone who liked this particular Joker. I also think it did do serious damage to the Joker IP overall, but he's only a decade away from public domain, so they probably don't care as much as they otherwise would.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2024, 12:54:06 PM by Rushy »

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3539
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1127 on: October 21, 2024, 08:58:30 PM »
Joker was embraced by chuds immediately upon its release, leading to articles like this being written just a few weeks later. If Hollywood had been as worried by the movie's reception by the "wrong" people as you say, they had plenty of warning and plenty of time to change course before the Oscars. You might actually be right about the budget being fudged, as, like I said, I can't imagine how this movie with its whopping two locations cost triple what the first one did, but even if we suppose that the studio didn't lose money with this, deliberately trying to "self-destruct" a billion-dollar franchise out of spite is a weird step for a group of Hollywood producers, as opposed to one frustrated auteur.

I'm reminded of a dream I had some months ago where the MCU ended abruptly with an ugly, poorly-animated CGI short where a grotesque, giant Trump appeared on a beach and set off a huge explosion, destroying the world and killing everyone. This short was extremely controversial and was interpreted as being a spiteful take-that statement to the world at large because of the increasing likelihood of Trump being reelected president. It was extremely funny and I woke up laughing.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3539
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« Reply #1128 on: December 01, 2024, 04:14:48 AM »
I've watched The Penguin. It's good. It's stylish and well-directed, the production design is great and helps build on this version of Gotham, which feels like a unique, distinctive city without being outright fantastical, and as much of a cliché as it is to say this, Colin Farrell really is unrecognizable in the lead role. I'll also say that I never quite knew where the story was going from episode to episode, and that's generally a good thing. It's also surprisingly funny at times, and has some nice examples of humor that don't rely on quips. So yeah, the short version of this review is that this is a fun watch. I recommend it to anyone who liked The Batman.

And now here come the criticisms. This is the latest dark and gritty DC adaptation to borrow very, very heavily from older, well-regarded properties. In this case, it's clearly The Sopranos and Breaking Bad. Oz has a toxic, creepy relationship with his ailing mother because Tony Soprano did. Oz and Victor team up to manufacture drugs and take over the underworld because Walter and Jesse did. The latter bugs me more, because at least with the mother subplot, as blatant a lift as it is, it's still justified within the show's story. Oz and Victor's partnership, on the other hand, makes no sense, especially in the first few episodes. Oz has no reason to recruit and confide in Victor, especially not after Victor repeatedly messes up his tasks and proves himself to be an inept schemer. And Victor himself has no reason to hang out with someone he already knows is a psycho and has contemplated murdering him. It isn't until a few episodes in that Victor suddenly finds his ambition to rise to the top. None of this is helped by the fact that Victor looks like a choir boy and radiates innocence, making him even less convincing as an ambitious hustler. They partner up for no better reason than the fact that Breaking Bad was a beloved show and a big hit, and the writers really wanted to create another Walter and Jesse. Being derivative isn't inherently a bad thing. But you've got to make sure that the elements you borrow fit properly into the new story. Oz and Victor's partnership is something that doesn't fit.

There's been a lot of praise aimed at Cristin Milioti over her performance as Sofia. I can't really agree with it. There are elements of a strong performance there, like her manic eyes and abrupt transitions from being strong and assured to frightened and vulnerable, but the effect is all but ruined by her ridiculous exaggerated accent. Apparently I'm the only person who's bothered by this, but I couldn't take a word she said seriously. It's far too hammy and over-the-top, and it's incredibly obvious that she's deliberately pronouncing the er sound in words as oi (as in words like certain and perfect) rather than simply creating that impression by slurring her words slightly the way actual New Yorkers do. Real people don't talk like this. Bugs Bunny talks like this, the Three Stooges talk like this, Harley Quinn talks like this (and incidentally, I think one of the biggest stumbling blocks of Margot Robbie's portrayal of Harley is that the accent doesn't translate well into live action). Again, maybe it's just me, but I don't hear a real person when I hear her talk, I just hear an unintentional caricature in what's supposed to be a serious, dramatic story. On a related note, Sofia becomes far less interesting in the latter half of the series once she becomes all empowered and whatnot and turns into a more generic villain. I much preferred the unpredictable version of her in the first few episodes.

My previous points are totally subjective and I'm sure that plenty of people disagree with me on them, which is totally cool and not something I can really argue. However, I will die on the hill of my next criticism being a major flaw - the show goes down the Nolan route and uses dialogue to explicitly spell out the themes of the story and the hidden depths of the characters in a direct pipeline from the writers to the viewers. Just so there's no confusion, right? No ambiguity. No need to interpret anything or use a little critical thinking. It's awful, and it happens multiple times, the most obvious being in the final episode, when one character straight up explains Oz's character to the audience by saying that he presents himself as x, but he's really y, although he'll never admit it, and it's all because of z. And make no mistake, despite being a spinoff of a PG-13 movie, this show is rated TV-MA and is definitely intended for adults, with plenty of swearing, smoking, and bloody violence, so it's not like they even have the excuse of wanting to dumb things down for younger audiences. I almost suspect that the writers were hoping to avoid having chuds idolize Oz and turn him into an edgelord icon like Tyler Durden or the Joker, so they made a point of saying explicitly as they could that Oz is a bad guy and we shouldn't like him. I can understand that desire, but it's not worth compromising the show. They should have just let the art speak for itself.

Despite my criticisms, the show is good. It's far, far from being one of the best TV shows of all time, or even one of the best HBO shows of all time (I strongly suspect that much like how Joker used capeshit trappings to lure in an audience that seldom watches non-blockbusters, this show also used its capeshit trappings to lure in an audience that seldom watches prestige TV shows, which might account for the people raving about it being the best show ever), but it's still worth a watch. If nothing else, it's nice to see capeshit that doesn't fit the Marvel mold and also isn't coming from Zack Snyder or Todd Phillips.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y