Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think I asked for reasonable evidence for whether Kamala worked at McDonald's.Which we all know you're immediately going to call fake or lies.
Since everyone is interested in evidence...I mean, I'm not interested in evidence that Harris worked a menial job 40 years ago…
Why did you mash two sides of the argument?
Firstly, it's extremely unlikely that the IRS is hanging onto records of the income tax that a fast-food worker paid forty years ago; secondly, there's no good reason (both in the sense of Kamala's political interests and the public interest) to ask them to try to verify Kamala's McDonald's employment; thirdly, that's not a thing the IRS would do even if there was a good reason to verify Kamala's McDonald's employment; and fourthly, Trump and his supporters would immediately label any evidence the IRS produced as fabricated, so what would even be the point? Nobody who isn't already a ride-or-die Trump fan doubts that Kamala worked at McDonald's when she was younger, because it's entirely believable and would be an utterly pointless thing to lie about.
Do you really expect a fast food franchise with a high employee turnover rate to keep employee records from 40 years ago?
How did you come by this assertion?
Harris isn't necessarily a liar. Maybe she really does believe she worked at McDonald's, despite having never worked there.
Imagine falling so hard for the propaganda that you think Kamala Hussain Harris ever worked a minimum wage job in her life.
Um, imagine falling for the propaganda so hard that you reject without reason just the notion that Kamala Harris might have ever worked a minimum wage job in her life?
How did you come by this assertion?
Harris isn't necessarily a liar. Maybe she really does believe she worked at McDonald's, despite having never worked there.
So many that you couldn’t name one.
Laws pretty much by definition restrict your freedom. They dictate what you must or must not do.
Y'all, the Brits don't even know what freedom is.Yeah. You just keep on standing on the side of the road waiting till a little man tells you that you can cross, lest you get fined, while congratulating yourselves on how free you are.
Hillary might have had a far better election night had Comey not nuked her from high orbit just days before the election.
Fantastic. So glad you read the posts in here. Great mods all around, thanks for stopping by.
I wish someone would mansplain Eurovision to me. What’s it like an annual song and dance show and the winner gets crowned Dancing Queen by ABBA?It's not mansplaining if you don't know what it is and are asking for an explanation.
I hate all of you sm
I can use specialised software to see much more than a magical space station. Be bold, name what you'd like to see. Specialised software will sort it out.
How do you know it was the same object? What if ...
The overwhelming preponderence of evidence supporting it, and the total lack of any firm evidence to show that it could be anything else.
Do you have anything in support of your "What if ..."
Round-earthers say it’s moving at 17K mph.
... which is entirely consistent with both the stated orbital height, and duration of orbit.
I've seen it twice in an evening, on more than one occasion; each appearance separated by 90 mins or so. Calculate the length of orbit, based on stated speed, height and textbook radius of Earth, and you arrive at an orbital time of around 90 mins.
It's also consistent with the first orbital satellite, Sputnik 1, which was not only seen, but heard, as folks on the ground both watched it and listened to its beep-beep radio transmission. Accounts of what people saw and heard also mention an orbital time of around 90 mins, implying similar speed.
