The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Community => Topic started by: farolero on December 16, 2016, 03:13:56 PM
-
they lied to us with the 3 dimension thing the conspirators want to limit our imagination and constarint it, there are at least 4 obvious dimensions.
xposition y position z position and size which determines gravity
you see the accelerating ground theory about the flat earth is right
the ground is accelearting up at 9.8 m/s2 and thats because the flat earth is inflating and hence the ground acceleretes up
you just dont notice this inflation cause your eyes and the measure instrument inflate at same rate
-
Regarding the flatness of Erath (https://www.google.ca/maps/@29.9594348,-92.0492005,5276m/data=!3m1!1e3) I think you're right. It looks pretty flat.
-
So not only am I accelerating all the time, but expanding with it? No wonder I wake up with a headache.
-
not only that as the flat earths size doubles so momentum is conserved time goes at half rate
which means you double your speed in half the time so eventually we go to a transfinite speed from a fixed size fixed time frame reference
they want to constarint your mind with the infinity limitation, thats aother lie from the conspirators as zeno
the turtle runs 1 m, in first second, half meter in half second, quarter of meter in quarter of second
so in second two it reaches destination is not that is stuck limited by infinity, she just go transfinite
edit.
how to be like chuck norris and count to infinity twice.
I define number as equal to one and in next second of my time i doublle and in next quarter of second i double it again and so on
and when at 3 seconds of my time that number is define as transnfinite i take it gain an double it in first second and then double it again in next half second and so on
so is it infinite and zero the very same thing
did i took the zero and make it infinite and then making it zero again?
-
Regarding the flatness of Erath (https://www.google.ca/maps/@29.9594348,-92.0492005,5276m/data=!3m1!1e3) I think you're right. It looks pretty flat.
you can easily tell when it becomes a cgi
actually i believe more the koreans did go to the sun when it was turned off than the nasa bs
-
Do you have a brother called Intikam?
-
Do you have a brother called Intikam?
nope
-
they lied to us with the 3 dimension thing the conspirators want to limit our imagination and constarint it, there are at least 4 obvious dimensions.
xposition y position z position and size which determines gravity
you see the accelerating ground theory about the flat earth is right
the ground is accelearting up at 9.8 m/s2 and thats because the flat earth is inflating and hence the ground acceleretes up
you just dont notice this inflation cause your eyes and the measure instrument inflate at same rate
First, you insist that Newton lied to us and "gravity is just centrifugal force".
Now you claim "newton lied and gravity is just inflation".
Maybe get your story straight before throwing false accusations around and foisting you dreamings onto the world.
By the way, just how big would the flat earth be if is was inflating at that rate for even the 6,020 years of Bishop Ussher's chronology?
-
i contemplate different scenerarios
earth would be transfinitally big of course you dont notice cause youre eyes and measure instruments are transfinitally big as well
of course due to conservation of angular momentum as we double size time rate halves
-
i contemplate different scenerarios
earth would be transfinitally big of course you dont notice cause youre eyes and measure instruments are transfinitally big as well
of course due to conservation of angular momentum as we double size time rate halves
How does this fit in with your theory?:
(If you don't want to watch, it basically brings up the square-cube law.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkzQxw16G9w
-
Do you have a brother called Intikam?
LOL I was thinking the same thing about his drug-induced opening post.
-
How does this fit in with your theory?:
(If you don't want to watch, it basically brings up the square-cube law.)
because as you double size time rate halves so everything remains apparently the same
-
How does this fit in with your theory?:
(If you don't want to watch, it basically brings up the square-cube law.)
because as you double size time rate halves so everything remains apparently the same
If we assume an initial value for g(or UA or Epxansion acceleration?) of 9.81m/s2 then double the distance and halve the time rate we are now saying that the new value is 19.62m/2 seconds2?(In this expanded state we would be perceiving the 19.62m as 9.81m and the 2 seconds as one second) But effectively, wouldn't the rate be staying the same and the square-cube law problem would still exist?
-
not really as long as you have a relative size of 1.80 m for a 9.8 m/s2 or 90 cm for 19.6 m/s2
as a clue ill tell you that the giants are time travellers, travelling in space is travel in time
if you take mass as inflating in front of space you can take as well space shrinks in front of mass
if you tke an shrinking frame of reference you expect to find a place in the cog moon earth where space spands and mass shrinks the opposite to gravity a wormhhole or time portal
i think movies are real obtained with a chronovisor and news and nasa stuff false
this is accurate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWphqA1Slrw
-
not really as long as you have a relative size of 1.80 m for a 9.8 m/s2 or 90 cm for 19.6 m/s2
as a clue ill tell you that the giants are time travellers, travelling in space is travel in time
if you take mass as inflating in front of space you can take as well space shrinks in front of mass
if you tke an shrinking frame of reference you expect to find a place in the cog moon earth where space spands and mass shrinks the opposite to gravity a wormhhole or time portal
i think movies are real obtained with a chronovisor and news and nasa stuff false
this is accurate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWphqA1Slrw
you MUST be intikam's relative!
-
you MUST be intikam's relative!
Have a day off for low-content and a personal attack
-
you MUST be intikam's relative!
Have a day off for low-content and a personal attack
its not an attack at all. I know of only one other person - intikam - whose logic, science and maths approximates this poster's. Intikam claimed Australia was in the northern hemispher and north of japan and (contradictorily) also not far from London.
I believe they may be related.