Unknown.Well if UA affects the earth, but not the objects on it (us, aircraft, balloons etc), somehow also affects the sun, moon and stars!
Unknown.
Unknown.Ok then, is there an explanation to apsis of the Sun and Moon?
Well if UA affects the earth, but not the objects on it (us, aircraft, balloons etc), somehow also affects the sun, moon and stars!Unknown.
I've tried to ask this before Rab:Well if UA affects the earth, but not the objects on it (us, aircraft, balloons etc), somehow also affects the sun, moon and stars!Unknown.
What decides if something oi accelerated with UA and what is not? Altitude, composition aetheric winds?
I really thought that was pretty straight forward.
How does your UA know to accelerate the earth, the sun and moon and stars but NOT the objects ON the earth?
And as an extension, do objects gradually get affected by UA as they get further above the surface?
How else can I ask it?
What I think is an amazing coincidence is that somehow the moon and sun don't collide with the flat earth, yet a ball I throw into the air comes back down again.No response!
Is there some magic distance required to negate the UA?
(don't know what UA means, but my guess would be "unknown acceleration"? Please correct me if I'm wrong)
As I said, the matter is unknown.
Unknown.
Unknown.
Come on Tom! You can do better than this. You are one of the most vocal proponents of FE theory making valid predictions.
Seems to me that one of the most important tenets of FE theory would be able to make predictions on how everything, other than the FE, is affected by the force which keeps everything in place on the FE.
But it is observed, the sun does not fall back to Earth, ergo something holds it up.Unknown.
Come on Tom! You can do better than this. You are one of the most vocal proponents of FE theory making valid predictions.
Seems to me that one of the most important tenets of FE theory would be able to make predictions on how everything, other than the FE, is affected by the force which keeps everything in place on the FE.
We work from experiment to experience here. We have standards. Whatever keeps the sun up is not testable or observed, and making a prediction of something so beyond the range of human experience is antithetical to the empirical tenets of Zeteticism, and is more in line with Round Earth ramblings about gravitons and black matter.
That such is the sun's annual course is demonstrable by actual observation; but if it is asked why it traverses such a peculiarly concentric path, no practical answer can be given, and no theory or speculation can be tolerated. At no distant period perhaps, we may have collected sufficient matter-of-fact evidence to enable us to understand it; but until that occurs, the Zetetic process only permits us to say:--"The peculiar motion is visible to us, but, of the cause, at present we are ignorant."
The sun is observed to be in the sky. However, the answer for the mechanism which keeps the sun in the sky will be along the same lines with how Rowbotham answers why the sun travels North-South through the year:I can provide you with a pretty conclusive justification that explains the paths of the sun and moon...
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za25.htmQuoteThat such is the sun's annual course is demonstrable by actual observation; but if it is asked why it traverses such a peculiarly concentric path, no practical answer can be given, and no theory or speculation can be tolerated. At no distant period perhaps, we may have collected sufficient matter-of-fact evidence to enable us to understand it; but until that occurs, the Zetetic process only permits us to say:--"The peculiar motion is visible to us, but, of the cause, at present we are ignorant."
We would never hear anything like this from a Round Earth scientist or scientific journal.
I can provide you with a pretty conclusive justification that explains the paths of the sun and moon...
I doubt you'd listen though.
We work from experiment to experience here. We have standards.
We likely know much, much more about Round Earth Theory and the history of astronomy than you do.
The moon actually does turn a little. In fact, it turns so much that the far side of the moon was mapped by astronomers long before NASA claimed to have gone there.
Please carefully explain to me what "gravitons and black matter" might have to do with the shape of the earth! If you want to know the shape of something - measure it!Unknown.
Come on Tom! You can do better than this. You are one of the most vocal proponents of FE theory making valid predictions.
Seems to me that one of the most important tenets of FE theory would be able to make predictions on how everything, other than the FE, is affected by the force which keeps everything in place on the FE.
We work from experiment to experience here. We have standards. Whatever keeps the sun up is not testable or observed, and making a prediction of something so beyond the range of human experience is antithetical to the empirical tenets of Zeteticism, and is more in line with Round Earth ramblings about gravitons and black matter.
Wow.We work from experiment to experience here. We have standards.We likely know much, much more about Round Earth Theory and the history of astronomy than you do.The moon actually does turn a little. In fact, it turns so much that the far side of the moon was mapped by astronomers long before NASA claimed to have gone there.
A moment of silence please, so that we can all appreciate the full irony of these statements.
.
.
.
Thank you, Please continue.
Unknown.
Come on Tom! You can do better than this. You are one of the most vocal proponents of FE theory making valid predictions.
Seems to me that one of the most important tenets of FE theory would be able to make predictions on how everything, other than the FE, is affected by the force which keeps everything in place on the FE.
We work from experiment to experience here. We have standards. Whatever keeps the sun up is not testable or observed, and making a prediction of something so beyond the range of human experience is antithetical to the empirical tenets of Zeteticism, and is more in line with Round Earth ramblings about gravitons and black matter.
On a side note, how, exactly, does experiment to experience actually work? How does one experiment on/with something without having had an experience (interaction) with it?
How can sun and moon levitate in the air above us without falling down, the same way a stone I drop will fall down?--- the same way a rainbow can levitate in the air above us without falling down.
What am I missing?The sun and the moon are not physical objects.
The sun and the moon are not physical objects.
The sun is a focal point of parabolic rays and the moon is a reflection upon the firmament.