That animation on the Wikipedia page with the Moon sliding from right to left into the shadow is incorrect:

It tries to explain why the shadow is coming in from the top-down. But we can see that the face of the moon is actually tilted in the eclipse:

If we compare that to the Lunar coordinate system means that the shadow is actually coming in from a Western direction to the lunar face, and is not coming in from the North of the Moon:

You're trying to apply RE dynamics to a discussion of FE dynamics. The two are completely different. Yes, there is tilt in the RE model because of the rotation of the earth. In the FE model, tilt comes as a result of rotation about the viewer. The results of those dynamics are completely different. I've illustrated this to you already as linked.
Ending your attempted deflection from the topic at hand, let's get back to FE and how EA would produce a shadow on the moon. To simplify it, let's think of a location where the middle of totality places the moon with the viewer sitting on the straight line between the sun and moon. This person should see the shadow rise nearly straight from the bottom of the moon and then return back to the bottom of the moon. Those off that direct line are going to see some tilt. With an eclipse lasting a few hours, that tilt will change some. What won't change, is that if the observer is between the moon and the sun, the shadow must come from the bottom up.
An additional item, which I've not brought up until now is that every FE/EA lunar eclipse should be identical since the mechanism for creating them has to be identical with the only exception being the duration of totality. That could vary. The position and movement of the shadow must be identical in every case.