Actually, I have heard said tape recording of Trump admitting to grabbing a woman by the "pussy". I know we have our disagreements, but I'm sure even you can admin that grabbing a woman by their genitals is sexual assault.
Edit: After reading the exact quote that AATW posted below, I will correct myself.... Trump technically didn't admit to grabbing women by their genitals. He DID admit to kissing them (which is still sexual assault), and he insinuates that grabbing their genitals is 'OK'. He also implies that he has done this himself.
The argument that the "grab them by the pussy" argument isn't really incriminating if you pay attention to Trump's precise choice of words or whatever is ridiculous and not reflective of how pretty much anyone in the world speaks. As if Trump, in the middle of bragging about what a stud he is and how he starts kissing women automatically without even waiting, would suddenly just change the subject completely without so much as a "by the way" and make a hypothetical comment about how he
could grab women by the pussy if he were so inclined, but totally doesn't and never has. Of course that's not what happened. And if this defense had any truth to it, or even just plausibility, of course Trump and/or his team would have made the argument rather than have him do what he truly hates and apologize for the comments.
Responding to a couple of points in a general sense rather than specifically quoting anyone - Ilhan Omar did not marry her brother, and there's no evidence to suggest that she did beyond the fact that it's not immediately falsifiable, due to not much being publicly known about the man she married - which isn't actually evidence at all. There really isn't much more to say about it than that. It's a smear concocted by anonymous dipshits on the Internet, spread by cranks in far-right media, and dutifully repeated by the president.
Trump's frequent, outrageous lies are well-documented. He lies about the weather, about voting fraud, about fake people who totally love him and everything he does, about history, about natural disasters, about what's clearly been recorded on tape or video, and so on. Yes, I've noticed that
Politifact has on at least a few occasions dinged Republicans harder than Democrats for statements that are largely the same, but that legitimate flaw doesn't take away from the enormity of Trump's documented flagrant dishonesty. You can like Trump for being the "bad boy" of Washington, you can like him for his political acumen, and you can even like him for the childish, sophomoric reason of "if the establishment says he's bad then he must be good," but there's no sense in pretending that dishonesty isn't a major part of the Trump package.