http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/15/donald-trump-fake-news-238379Trumpadumpdump
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
If we are not speculating then we must assume
Holy shit, we need to get in on this. Imagine being able to supply memes to President Trump.
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MXBut the emails?
the president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at will
Smash the MSM!!!Free dissemination of information!!!I loved it when he was giving it to the media, seems like he's stopped attacking them as much which is sad.The media exists to make money Dave, nothing else, don't be so naive.
That the media isn't to be trusted on face value, their agenda is profits not truth.
Quotethe president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at willoh ok
I heard on the radio it was confirmed false.
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 16, 2017, 08:14:14 AMI heard on the radio it was confirmed false. Trump would disagree.
Quote from: honk on May 16, 2017, 01:29:41 AMhttp://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MXBut the emails?Quotethe president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at willoh okComing up next: top intelligence officials and also someone from the Democratic party call for Trump's impeachment following news that he pees while sitting down.
Quote from: SexWarrior on May 16, 2017, 07:52:30 AMQuote from: honk on May 16, 2017, 01:29:41 AMhttp://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18B2MXBut the emails?Quotethe president has the authority to disclose even the most highly classified information at willoh okComing up next: top intelligence officials and also someone from the Democratic party call for Trump's impeachment following news that he pees while sitting down.It's actually more serious than that as it breaks espionage etiquette and puts other intelligence operatives at risk. It means our allies might not want to share information with us anymore.
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
The official statement released that the story is false doesn't actually dispute any of the points made in the story (it kind of pretends it does in a masterpiece of political doubletalk). I therefore see no reason to not consider the story confirmed, since surely if there was something legitimate to contend they would have done so.
What did TPC find? If Congress applied the 15 percent rate to the broad definition of income, the 10-year revenue loss could be as much as $2 trillion. If it chose the narrow definition, the revenue loss could be only about half as much.With the broad income definition, three-quarters of the benefit would go to highest-income one percent of households, who make $700,000 or more. They’d get an average tax cut of about $76,000, or 4.8 percent of their after-tax incomeBy contrast, fewer than five percent of middle-income households would get a tax cut, averaging $370.
McMaster added that Trump made a spur-of-the-moment decision to share the information in the context of the conversation he was having with the Russian officials. He said that "the president wasn’t even aware of where this information came from" and had not been briefed on the source.