*

Offline markjo

  • *
  • Posts: 8056
  • Zetetic Council runner-up
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #180 on: October 18, 2024, 09:28:21 PM »
https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/a-timeline-of-russias-nuclear-threats-against-the-west-947

Here's a big scary list of all the times Russia has brought up using weapons that don't exist and then, unsurprisingly, not using them.
Here is a big scary list of all the times Russia tested weapons that don't exist and then, unsurprisingly, tested them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_the_Soviet_Union
Abandon hope all ye who press enter here.

Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. -- Charles Darwin

If you can't demonstrate it, then you shouldn't believe it.

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8910
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #181 on: October 19, 2024, 12:15:13 AM »
https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/a-timeline-of-russias-nuclear-threats-against-the-west-947

Here's a big scary list of all the times Russia has brought up using weapons that don't exist and then, unsurprisingly, not using them.
Here is a big scary list of all the times Russia tested weapons that don't exist and then, unsurprisingly, tested them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_the_Soviet_Union

Ah, yes, of course. The government of the Soviet Union. Well renowned for their trustworthiness and guile. How could I possibly claim they made something up? It's impossible.

*

Offline markjo

  • *
  • Posts: 8056
  • Zetetic Council runner-up
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #182 on: October 19, 2024, 02:49:22 AM »
https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/a-timeline-of-russias-nuclear-threats-against-the-west-947

Here's a big scary list of all the times Russia has brought up using weapons that don't exist and then, unsurprisingly, not using them.
Here is a big scary list of all the times Russia tested weapons that don't exist and then, unsurprisingly, tested them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_the_Soviet_Union

Ah, yes, of course. The government of the Soviet Union. Well renowned for their trustworthiness and guile. How could I possibly claim they made something up? It's impossible.
Well, it was the Cold War.  They were obligated to keep up with all of the US tests of weapons that don't exist, weren't they?
Abandon hope all ye who press enter here.

Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. -- Charles Darwin

If you can't demonstrate it, then you shouldn't believe it.

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8910
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #183 on: October 19, 2024, 03:51:04 PM »
Well, it was the Cold War.  They were obligated to keep up with all of the US tests of weapons that don't exist, weren't they?

Correct. The Cold War was primarily an information (read: propaganda) war. It turns out that propaganda alone cannot run an economy, so the Soviet Union collapsed.

Nuclear weapons are propaganda to keep up the current geopolitical regime.

*

Offline Tom Bishop

  • Zetetic Council Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10841
  • Flat Earth Believer
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #184 on: November 05, 2024, 05:34:10 PM »
Considering the honesty of the governments and vast incentive and resources to do this, this claim of possessing nuclear weapons can pretty much be boiled down to 'somebody said something'.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6709
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #185 on: November 18, 2024, 07:31:12 PM »
They must feel like right idiots, suffering all the effects of the bombs which don't exist.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy4ng2873jro
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8910
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #186 on: November 18, 2024, 08:04:30 PM »
They must feel like right idiots, suffering all the effects of the bombs which don't exist.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy4ng2873jro

If you read the article you'd notice a whole lot of no evidence for any of these people's claims. One goes as far as to say he flew through nuclear weapon clouds, yet no medical evidence proves that is the case. Mysteriously, the records proving their claims all vanished into thin air! How odd!

It's almost like the government didn't want physical records with a paper trail that would prove their propaganda to be blatantly false.

Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #187 on: November 19, 2024, 08:26:13 AM »
Does everybody know that bank in Hiro was opened 2 days after the explosion. The trams were running 3 days after. Old pictures show that electric poles and trees were standing still just after the explosion. Nothing got vaporized there. Roads on the ground were intact. No crater. No bald spot.
83000 people turned to live Hiro just after the bombing. In February 1946 the population in Hiro was already 169000. In 1955 already 500000 people lived in Hiro. In 1964 the population rised over 1 million people.
You see Hiro and Naga got populated very quickly.

Did you also know that the Chernobyl power station continued to produce electricity till 2000 and was only closed because of external pressure. It shows that the concerns about the dangers of radioactivity are greatly overhyped.

Galen Winsor was a nuclear specialist and engineer and has made videos of licking uranium dust. He also swam in cooling water of the reactor and even drink the water from it. Just to show to the regulators that the radioactivity fear is overhyped. He and his team barehandedly built the nuclear arsenal of US before the regulators got into the business.

Gun type bomb that was used in Hiro was never tested. Wiki says: " it was assumed almost certainly to work".

Implosion type bomb supposedly compressed plutonium metal to double density with conventional explosives. Do you belive that a metal could be compressed to double density? Metal is solid and would not compress like a gas.

Also, the velocity of gases and debris from conventional explosives is around 4km/s to 10 km/s. The 6 kg of plutonium inside the bomb was inside 120 kg and 7cm thick uranium shell which itself was inside 120 kg duraluminium shell. The conventional explosives supposedly needed to schock vaporize those shells to reach to the plutonium and to the beryllium pellet inside the plutonium .

Now consider that the apollo tin can space capsule entered the atmosphere at 11 km/s and was violently braked down in 5 minutes and did not ever overheat or got compressed to double density. It did not vaporized although spent 5 minutes in violent atmospheric drag. This kind of braking is equivalent to 250 tons of rocket fuel burned in the rocket engine to brake the capsule down from 11 km/s.

Why should we belive that 120 kg 7 cm thick uranium shell covered with 120 kg duraluminium shell hollow kettlebell with 6 kg plutonium inside would even vaporize with conventional explosives giving expanding  gas velocities around 8 km/s. I myself do not belive it would vaporize. 

The explosion would simply mirror from the duraluminium and uranium shell and move towards empty atmosphere.

Also, does anybody remember  Jumbo. The 200 ton metallic nuclear condom to prevent rare element plutonium to spread all over the place if the test bomb would only fizzle. It was built , it was dragged to place and eventually they did not use it because as explained" we had enough plutonium eventually and we do not want to spread another 200 tons of radiactive materials into the atmosphere".

In reality they chickened out because the one foot thick walled Jumbo would not simply vaporize. So they dragged it away and built a platform for it to suspend it in the air. After the explosion it simply fell down but otherwise it was completely intact. No scratch, no nothing. They even wanted to destroy it with conventional explosives but only managed to blow off side caps, nothing more. Remember , modern tank weigh also 50 , 70 tons. If Jumbo got no scratces then modern tanks would also be fine. No vaporization , nothing.


So, in overall, nukes are hoax. Beautiful scam to milk taxpayers money endlessly.

Cold war was also hoax. Russia was  starving and US sent goverment subsidized grain there to help out.






*

Offline TenGolf

  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Random Chinese kid you found on the internet.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #188 on: November 22, 2024, 07:54:19 PM »
Fun fact: on 2 Nov 2023, Russia revoked its CTBT ratification.

The threat is real - and has been for over a year.
Rounding the Earth since 2020

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8910
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #189 on: November 23, 2024, 01:37:54 PM »
Fun fact: on 2 Nov 2023, Russia revoked its CTBT ratification.

The threat is real - and has been for over a year.

Yes, Russia's nuclear bombs are very scary and very real. That's why every time Putin says "if you do x we will nuke you" and then we do x, we have gotten nuked. We just keep getting nuked over and over again. It's horrible. Sometimes I wake up and my front yard has been nuked several times in a row. I hope we all surrender to Putin soon so he stops nuking us.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6709
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #190 on: November 24, 2024, 03:40:48 PM »
Fun fact: on 2 Nov 2023, Russia revoked its CTBT ratification.

The threat is real - and has been for over a year.

Yes, Russia's nuclear bombs are very scary and very real. That's why every time Putin says "if you do x we will nuke you" and then we do x, we have gotten nuked. We just keep getting nuked over and over again. It's horrible. Sometimes I wake up and my front yard has been nuked several times in a row. I hope we all surrender to Putin soon so he stops nuking us.
It's just possible that Putin hasn't nuked us because he knows that we would retaliate.
The only time they've been used in warfare was when the country which used them was the only one who had them.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

*

Offline TenGolf

  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Random Chinese kid you found on the internet.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #191 on: November 24, 2024, 09:03:57 PM »
Fun fact: on 2 Nov 2023, Russia revoked its CTBT ratification.

The threat is real - and has been for over a year.

Yes, Russia's nuclear bombs are very scary and very real. That's why every time Putin says "if you do x we will nuke you" and then we do x, we have gotten nuked. We just keep getting nuked over and over again. It's horrible. Sometimes I wake up and my front yard has been nuked several times in a row. I hope we all surrender to Putin soon so he stops nuking us.

Yeah, my house is a wasteland.
Rounding the Earth since 2020

Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« Reply #192 on: November 27, 2024, 07:15:34 AM »
Fun fact: on 2 Nov 2023, Russia revoked its CTBT ratification.

The threat is real - and has been for over a year.


You are afraid of a piece of paper.

Nukes do not exist. Nuclear reaction is not explosive.